News | Politics
28 Apr 2017 2:56
NZCity News
NZCity CalculatorReturn to NZCity

  • Start Page
  • Personalise
  • Sport
  • Weather
  • Olympic Games
  • Finance
  • Shopping
  • Jobs
  • Horoscopes
  • Lotto Results
  • Photo Gallery
  • Site Gallery
  • TVNow
  • Dating
  • SearchNZ
  • NZSearch
  • Crime.co.nz
  • RugbyLeague
  • Make Home
  • About NZCity
  • Contact NZCity
  • Your Privacy
  • Advertising
  • Login
  • Join for Free

  •   Home > News > Politics

    No jury in Craig, Slater defamation case

    A judge alone will decide defamation claims by former Conservative Party leader Colin Craig and Whale Oil blogger Cameron Slater.


    A defamation claim by former Conservative Party leader Colin Craig and Whale Oil blogger Cameron Slater won't be heard before a jury.

    Mr Craig is suing Slater and co-publisher Social Media Consultants Ltd over 18 statements made on radio, television and on the blog about Mr Craig's relationship with his former press secretary Rachel MacGregor.

    Ms MacGregor resigned shortly before the 2014 election and made complaints of sexual harassment against Mr Craig, leading to a settlement and his resignation as party leader.

    Slater is counter-suing Mr Craig for two statements made in a press conference and booklet alleging he and the Whale Oil blog were involved in a campaign to force his resignation from the Conservative Party.

    A jury had already been summoned for the trial, which is scheduled to begin on May 8, but Justice Christopher Toogood on Tuesday ordered the case be heard by a judge alone.

    Slater had sought a jury hearing, while Mr Craig wanted judge-alone.

    In his judgment, Justice Toogood said Mr Craig believed the question trail to assist the jury decide the issues could run as long as 100 pages and "the time, effort and expertise required to follow it should not reasonably be required of a jury".

    But Slater's barrister Brian Henry said the case was not nearly as complex given the direction on legal matters was not controversial and the facts fell within a narrow compass.

    Justice Toogood disagreed.

    "Arising out of the allegations, 50 possibly defamatory meanings are asserted," he said.

    "The factual background to each of the publications is extensive."

    He said it would be unreasonable for a jury to work through the complex legal background of the case and ordered it be heard by a judge alone.

    The trial is expected to take three weeks.


    NZN




    © 2017 NZN, NZCity


     Other Politics News
     27 Apr: Government to spend $11b on infrastructure
     27 Apr: Cash for quake-hit councils: Brownlee
     27 Apr: Wall Street: Markets unmoved by Trump's tax plan unveiling
     26 Apr: NZ spied on Japan for US: report
     26 Apr: Syrian Government says US sanctions over chemical attack will harm regular Syrians
     25 Apr: Peter Dutton wants apology from ABC over reporting of Manus detention shooting
     25 Apr: Drought-stricken Indian farmers shock Tamil Nadu government into action
     Top Stories

    RUGBY RUGBY
    Halfback Hall in as sole Crusaders change More...


    BUSINESS BUSINESS
    Relief over NAFTA helps lift NZ dollar More...



     Today's News

    Rugby:
    Halfback Hall in as sole Crusaders change 21:56

    Rugby:
    Injury-hit Force ring in rugby changes 21:16

    Business:
    Relief over NAFTA helps lift NZ dollar 18:56

    Rugby:
    Wallabies coaches on hand for Waratahs 18:36

    Soccer:
    A-League semi-finals preview panel 18:06

    Law and Order:
    Families 'overwhelmed by kindness' 17:26

    Law and Order:
    Fleeing car closes Dunedin motorway 16:56

    Law and Order:
    Three scenes being examined by police 16:16

    Business:
    Government to spend $11b on infrastructure 16:16

    Accident and Emergency:
    SH1 reopens after Northland crash 15:26


     News Search






    Power Search


    © 2017 New Zealand City Ltd