News | Politics
21 Aug 2017 5:22
NZCity News
NZCity CalculatorReturn to NZCity

  • Start Page
  • Personalise
  • Sport
  • Weather
  • Olympic Games
  • Ski Report
  • Finance
  • Shopping
  • Jobs
  • Horoscopes
  • Lotto Results
  • Photo Gallery
  • Site Gallery
  • TVNow
  • Dating
  • SearchNZ
  • NZSearch
  • Crime.co.nz
  • RugbyLeague
  • Make Home
  • About NZCity
  • Contact NZCity
  • Your Privacy
  • Advertising
  • Login
  • Join for Free

  •   Home > News > Politics

    No jury in Craig, Slater defamation case

    A judge alone will decide defamation claims by former Conservative Party leader Colin Craig and Whale Oil blogger Cameron Slater.


    A defamation claim by former Conservative Party leader Colin Craig and Whale Oil blogger Cameron Slater won't be heard before a jury.

    Mr Craig is suing Slater and co-publisher Social Media Consultants Ltd over 18 statements made on radio, television and on the blog about Mr Craig's relationship with his former press secretary Rachel MacGregor.

    Ms MacGregor resigned shortly before the 2014 election and made complaints of sexual harassment against Mr Craig, leading to a settlement and his resignation as party leader.

    Slater is counter-suing Mr Craig for two statements made in a press conference and booklet alleging he and the Whale Oil blog were involved in a campaign to force his resignation from the Conservative Party.

    A jury had already been summoned for the trial, which is scheduled to begin on May 8, but Justice Christopher Toogood on Tuesday ordered the case be heard by a judge alone.

    Slater had sought a jury hearing, while Mr Craig wanted judge-alone.

    In his judgment, Justice Toogood said Mr Craig believed the question trail to assist the jury decide the issues could run as long as 100 pages and "the time, effort and expertise required to follow it should not reasonably be required of a jury".

    But Slater's barrister Brian Henry said the case was not nearly as complex given the direction on legal matters was not controversial and the facts fell within a narrow compass.

    Justice Toogood disagreed.

    "Arising out of the allegations, 50 possibly defamatory meanings are asserted," he said.

    "The factual background to each of the publications is extensive."

    He said it would be unreasonable for a jury to work through the complex legal background of the case and ordered it be heard by a judge alone.

    The trial is expected to take three weeks.


    NZN




    © 2017 NZN, NZCity


     Other Politics News
     20 Aug: Colin Meads, New Zealand rugby union legend, dies aged 81
     20 Aug: Ardern swamped at Labour campaign launch
     20 Aug: NZ should renegotiate TPP now: Robertson
     19 Aug: Protesters greet PM English in Dunedin
     19 Aug: Croatian president to arrive in NZ
     18 Aug: Dunne sets the record straight about Joyce
     18 Aug: Ardern still backs Greens as a partner
     Top Stories

    RUGBY RUGBY
    Colin Meads, New Zealand rugby union legend, dies aged 81 More...


    BUSINESS BUSINESS
    NZ should renegotiate TPP now: Robertson More...



     Today's News

    International:
    North Korea receiving constant oil supply as China refuses to go all in on isolating rogue state 4:37

    Living & Travel:
    Golden retriever unearths $100,000 worth of heroin while digging in backyard 4:37

    Tennis:
    Nick Kyrgios beats David Ferrer to reach Cincinnati Masters final, fresh after Rafael Nadal scalp 4:37

    Law and Order:
    Barcelona terrorist attack: What we know 4:37

    Auckland:
    Slip undermines Auckland home 21:57

    Motoring:
    Man dies in hospital days after crash 21:17

    Accident and Emergency:
    Fatal crash on Napier to Taupo road 20:37

    Law and Order:
    Tongariro search to continue 20:37

    Rugby League:
    Rooster JWH escapes NRL ban for elbow 18:57

    Rugby League:
    Hoffman no certainty for Melbourne goodbye 18:37


     News Search






    Power Search


    © 2017 New Zealand City Ltd