News | Politics
26 Jun 2017 14:03
NZCity News
NZCity CalculatorReturn to NZCity

  • Start Page
  • Personalise
  • Sport
  • Weather
  • Olympic Games
  • Ski Report
  • Finance
  • Shopping
  • Jobs
  • Horoscopes
  • Lotto Results
  • Photo Gallery
  • Site Gallery
  • TVNow
  • Dating
  • SearchNZ
  • NZSearch
  • Crime.co.nz
  • RugbyLeague
  • Make Home
  • About NZCity
  • Contact NZCity
  • Your Privacy
  • Advertising
  • Login
  • Join for Free

  •   Home > News > Politics

    No jury in Craig, Slater defamation case

    A judge alone will decide defamation claims by former Conservative Party leader Colin Craig and Whale Oil blogger Cameron Slater.


    A defamation claim by former Conservative Party leader Colin Craig and Whale Oil blogger Cameron Slater won't be heard before a jury.

    Mr Craig is suing Slater and co-publisher Social Media Consultants Ltd over 18 statements made on radio, television and on the blog about Mr Craig's relationship with his former press secretary Rachel MacGregor.

    Ms MacGregor resigned shortly before the 2014 election and made complaints of sexual harassment against Mr Craig, leading to a settlement and his resignation as party leader.

    Slater is counter-suing Mr Craig for two statements made in a press conference and booklet alleging he and the Whale Oil blog were involved in a campaign to force his resignation from the Conservative Party.

    A jury had already been summoned for the trial, which is scheduled to begin on May 8, but Justice Christopher Toogood on Tuesday ordered the case be heard by a judge alone.

    Slater had sought a jury hearing, while Mr Craig wanted judge-alone.

    In his judgment, Justice Toogood said Mr Craig believed the question trail to assist the jury decide the issues could run as long as 100 pages and "the time, effort and expertise required to follow it should not reasonably be required of a jury".

    But Slater's barrister Brian Henry said the case was not nearly as complex given the direction on legal matters was not controversial and the facts fell within a narrow compass.

    Justice Toogood disagreed.

    "Arising out of the allegations, 50 possibly defamatory meanings are asserted," he said.

    "The factual background to each of the publications is extensive."

    He said it would be unreasonable for a jury to work through the complex legal background of the case and ordered it be heard by a judge alone.

    The trial is expected to take three weeks.


    NZN




    © 2017 NZN, NZCity


     Other Politics News
     26 Jun: Donald Trump, Narendra Modi parallels excited conservative Hindu nationalist group
     25 Jun: Barclay offered to play PM recordings
     25 Jun: All the action at National's conference
     25 Jun: PNG election: Corruption and economy are Peter O'Neill's biggest worries as polls open
     25 Jun: PM sets the stage for National's campaign
     24 Jun: Hambali charges over Bali welcomed
     24 Jun: PM says Barclay recording may not exist
     Top Stories

    RUGBY RUGBY
    All Blacks show Hurricanes the way More...


    BUSINESS BUSINESS
    NZ King Salmon lifts earnings guidance More...



     Today's News

    Politics:
    Donald Trump, Narendra Modi parallels excited conservative Hindu nationalist group 13:57

    Golf:
    Ko slips further down world rankings 13:47

    Accident and Emergency:
    Otago plane crash investigation to begin 13:27

    International:
    Bali bombing: Guantanamo Bay detainee charged over 2002 attack, Julie Bishop welcomes move 13:17

    Boxing:
    Parker to fight Fury in Manchester 13:07

    Sailing:
    Dawson bronze wraps up World Cup regatta 12:27

    International:
    The silent partner: What it was like for journalist Eliza Harvey when her correspondent husband was shot 11:57

    Law and Order:
    Sir Ngatata Love's appeal dismissed 11:57

    Business:
    NZ King Salmon lifts earnings guidance 11:07

    Sailing:
    Team NZ must keep improving: Burling 10:48


     News Search






    Power Search


    © 2017 New Zealand City Ltd