News | Politics
20 Jan 2018 22:00
NZCity News
NZCity CalculatorReturn to NZCity

  • Start Page
  • Personalise
  • Days of Xmas
  • Sport
  • Weather
  • Finance
  • Shopping
  • Jobs
  • Horoscopes
  • Lotto Results
  • Photo Gallery
  • Site Gallery
  • TVNow
  • Dating
  • SearchNZ
  • NZSearch
  • Crime.co.nz
  • RugbyLeague
  • Make Home
  • About NZCity
  • Contact NZCity
  • Your Privacy
  • Advertising
  • Login
  • Join for Free

  •   Home > News > Politics

    No jury in Craig, Slater defamation case

    A judge alone will decide defamation claims by former Conservative Party leader Colin Craig and Whale Oil blogger Cameron Slater.


    A defamation claim by former Conservative Party leader Colin Craig and Whale Oil blogger Cameron Slater won't be heard before a jury.

    Mr Craig is suing Slater and co-publisher Social Media Consultants Ltd over 18 statements made on radio, television and on the blog about Mr Craig's relationship with his former press secretary Rachel MacGregor.

    Ms MacGregor resigned shortly before the 2014 election and made complaints of sexual harassment against Mr Craig, leading to a settlement and his resignation as party leader.

    Slater is counter-suing Mr Craig for two statements made in a press conference and booklet alleging he and the Whale Oil blog were involved in a campaign to force his resignation from the Conservative Party.

    A jury had already been summoned for the trial, which is scheduled to begin on May 8, but Justice Christopher Toogood on Tuesday ordered the case be heard by a judge alone.

    Slater had sought a jury hearing, while Mr Craig wanted judge-alone.

    In his judgment, Justice Toogood said Mr Craig believed the question trail to assist the jury decide the issues could run as long as 100 pages and "the time, effort and expertise required to follow it should not reasonably be required of a jury".

    But Slater's barrister Brian Henry said the case was not nearly as complex given the direction on legal matters was not controversial and the facts fell within a narrow compass.

    Justice Toogood disagreed.

    "Arising out of the allegations, 50 possibly defamatory meanings are asserted," he said.

    "The factual background to each of the publications is extensive."

    He said it would be unreasonable for a jury to work through the complex legal background of the case and ordered it be heard by a judge alone.

    The trial is expected to take three weeks.


    NZN




    © 2018 NZN, NZCity


     Other Politics News
     20 Jan: Dotcom suing NZ govt for 'billions'
     20 Jan: World reacts positively to Ardern's news
     20 Jan: Inflation data not expected to surprise
     20 Jan: From heat to icy cold for army drivers
     19 Jan: NZ will help raise our first child: Ardern
     19 Jan: Bougainville Copper Ltd has Panguna mine licence bid rejected following landowner divisions
     19 Jan: Kiwi up as US govt shutdown looms
     Top Stories

    RUGBY RUGBY
    Liam Messam signs for Toulon More...


    BUSINESS BUSINESS
    Business booming for Indonesia's 'sharia motorbike taxis' More...



     Today's News

    Cricket:
    NZ U19s trump South Africa at World Cup 21:36

    Tennis:
    Daniell through to Aust Open third round 20:36

    Cycling:
    Bibby wins Cycle Classic fourth stage 19:26

    Technology:
    Rocket Lab forced to abort launch again 19:06

    Golf:
    Fox improves standing in Abu Dhabi golf 18:16

    Law and Order:
    Man charged over fatal Northland fight 17:36

    Sports:
    Coll progresses in NYC squash tournament 17:16

    Auckland:
    Newmarket Plaza fire extinguished 16:36

    Hockey:
    Black Sticks fall to India, out of final 16:36

    International:
    Pope car's flat tyre prompts elaborate security operation 14:56


     News Search






    Power Search


    © 2018 New Zealand City Ltd