News | Law and Order
21 Jan 2018 2:24
NZCity News
NZCity CalculatorReturn to NZCity

  • Start Page
  • Personalise
  • Days of Xmas
  • Sport
  • Weather
  • Finance
  • Shopping
  • Jobs
  • Horoscopes
  • Lotto Results
  • Photo Gallery
  • Site Gallery
  • TVNow
  • Dating
  • SearchNZ
  • NZSearch
  • Crime.co.nz
  • RugbyLeague
  • Make Home
  • About NZCity
  • Contact NZCity
  • Your Privacy
  • Advertising
  • Login
  • Join for Free

  •   Home > News > Law and Order

    Pilots win retirement age appeal

    Two Kiwi pilots have successfully convinced New Zealand's Supreme Court that they should fly until they are 65.


    The Supreme Court has ruled that two New Zealand pilots were discriminated against due to age, and should be allowed to fly after they are 55.

    In 2014, the Employment Court ruled that senior pilots David Brown and Glen Sycamore were being discriminated against by being forced to retire at age 55, required by their 2002 contract with Cathay Pacific's subsidiary New Zealand Basing.

    Both pilots, who have flown for Cathay since the early 1990s, turned 55 in 2015.

    Restructuring for the company's pilots took place in 2008 and 2009 and it was agreed that local employment law for pilots from the UK, Canada and Australia was to be the rule - providing for retirement at 65 - but this was not the case for the 33 New Zealand pilots.

    Hong Kong law, where Cathay is based, does not prohibit discrimination by reason of age.

    NZ Basing appealed the Employment Court decision in the Appeal Court in 2016 and won, although Mr Brown and Mr Sycamore were granted leave to appeal.

    In a Supreme Court judgement released on Wednesday, five justices unanimously said that the Employment Court's decision - saying the duo could appeal the age limit under the provisions of New Zealand's Employment Relations Act - should be restored.

    They took the view that pilots weren't captured by any exceptions in the Human Rights Act and would fall within the Employment Relations Act.

    It would be "very odd" for the law to "allow discrimination in the employment context in relation to persons in the appellants' position, solely on the basis of the parties' choice of law," they said.

    The judges also set aside the Court of Appeal's costs order against the pilots, and ordered New Zealand Basing to pay the pilots' appeal court costs and the $25,000 for taking the case to the Supreme Court.

    © 2018 NZN, NZCity


     Other Law and Order News
     20 Jan: Man charged over fatal Northland fight
     20 Jan: Puppy found after snatched from owner
     20 Jan: Dotcom suing NZ govt for 'billions'
     20 Jan: Guns, drugs, $2.5m found in Auckland
     20 Jan: Body found on a Napier beach
     20 Jan: Search for Hamilton 84-year-old expands
     20 Jan: Two hit by car in Auckland street fight
     Top Stories

    RUGBY RUGBY
    Liam Messam signs for Toulon More...


    BUSINESS BUSINESS
    Business booming for Indonesia's 'sharia motorbike taxis' More...



     Today's News

    Soccer:
    Phoenix stun Jets 3-2 in A-League 23:26

    Basketball:
    Melb United dodges Brisbane's Bullets 23:06

    Cricket:
    NZ U19s trump South Africa at World Cup 21:36

    Tennis:
    Daniell through to Aust Open third round 20:36

    Cycling:
    Bibby wins Cycle Classic fourth stage 19:26

    Technology:
    Rocket Lab forced to abort launch again 19:06

    Golf:
    Fox improves standing in Abu Dhabi golf 18:16

    Law and Order:
    Man charged over fatal Northland fight 17:36

    Sports:
    Coll progresses in NYC squash tournament 17:16

    Auckland:
    Newmarket Plaza fire extinguished 16:36


     News Search






    Power Search


    © 2018 New Zealand City Ltd