News | Living & Travel
27 Sep 2017 8:43
NZCity News
NZCity CalculatorReturn to NZCity

  • Start Page
  • Personalise
  • Sport
  • Weather
  • Olympic Games
  • Ski Report
  • Finance
  • Shopping
  • Jobs
  • Horoscopes
  • Lotto Results
  • Photo Gallery
  • Site Gallery
  • TVNow
  • Dating
  • SearchNZ
  • NZSearch
  • RugbyLeague
  • Make Home
  • About NZCity
  • Contact NZCity
  • Your Privacy
  • Advertising
  • Login
  • Join for Free

  •   Home > News > Living & Travel

    Pilots win retirement age appeal

    Two Kiwi pilots have successfully convinced New Zealand's Supreme Court that they should fly until they are 65.

    The Supreme Court has ruled that two New Zealand pilots were discriminated against due to age, and should be allowed to fly after they are 55.

    In 2014, the Employment Court ruled that senior pilots David Brown and Glen Sycamore were being discriminated against by being forced to retire at age 55, required by their 2002 contract with Cathay Pacific's subsidiary New Zealand Basing.

    Both pilots, who have flown for Cathay since the early 1990s, turned 55 in 2015.

    Restructuring for the company's pilots took place in 2008 and 2009 and it was agreed that local employment law for pilots from the UK, Canada and Australia was to be the rule - providing for retirement at 65 - but this was not the case for the 33 New Zealand pilots.

    Hong Kong law, where Cathay is based, does not prohibit discrimination by reason of age.

    NZ Basing appealed the Employment Court decision in the Appeal Court in 2016 and won, although Mr Brown and Mr Sycamore were granted leave to appeal.

    In a Supreme Court judgement released on Wednesday, five justices unanimously said that the Employment Court's decision - saying the duo could appeal the age limit under the provisions of New Zealand's Employment Relations Act - should be restored.

    They took the view that pilots weren't captured by any exceptions in the Human Rights Act and would fall within the Employment Relations Act.

    It would be "very odd" for the law to "allow discrimination in the employment context in relation to persons in the appellants' position, solely on the basis of the parties' choice of law," they said.

    The judges also set aside the Court of Appeal's costs order against the pilots, and ordered New Zealand Basing to pay the pilots' appeal court costs and the $25,000 for taking the case to the Supreme Court.

    © 2017 NZN, NZCity

     Other Living & Travel News
     27 Sep: Bali volcano: Locals recall 'Mount Agung spewing fire, rocks, hot ashes' in deadly 1963 eruption
     27 Sep: App helps Chch users find mobility parks
     26 Sep: Bali volcano eruption threat not affecting tourism, airport says
     26 Sep: Council stops bolt gun euthanasia
     26 Sep: Search resumes for missing Dunedin man
     26 Sep: Woman, dog hit by car in Auckland
     25 Sep: Search for missing Dunedin man suspended
     Top Stories

    Pepsi ads deserve harsher penalty: lobby More...

    NZ dollar falls on election uncertainty More...

     Today's News

    Jennifer Lopez is donating $1 million to hurricane relief efforts in Puerto Rico 8:29

    Living & Travel:
    Bali volcano: Locals recall 'Mount Agung spewing fire, rocks, hot ashes' in deadly 1963 eruption 8:27

    NZ women's eight topple USA in heats 8:17

    Peters to brief caucus on coalition talks 8:07

    Quentin Tarantino celebrated his engagement to Daniella Pick at a star-studded party on Saturday (23.09.17) 7:59

    Living & Travel:
    App helps Chch users find mobility parks 7:57

    Health & Safety:
    Pepsi ads deserve harsher penalty: lobby 7:47

    Law and Order:
    Kiwi in court after sex robbery death 7:37

    Audrina Patridge met up with Corey Bohan on Sunday (24.09.17) morning 7:29

    Kirk revitalised on 2017 LPGA tour 7:27

     News Search

    Power Search

    © 2017 New Zealand City Ltd