News | Living & Travel
25 Nov 2017 14:44
NZCity News
NZCity CalculatorReturn to NZCity

  • Start Page
  • Personalise
  • Sport
  • Weather
  • Olympic Games
  • Finance
  • Shopping
  • Jobs
  • Horoscopes
  • Lotto Results
  • Photo Gallery
  • Site Gallery
  • TVNow
  • Dating
  • SearchNZ
  • NZSearch
  • Crime.co.nz
  • RugbyLeague
  • Make Home
  • About NZCity
  • Contact NZCity
  • Your Privacy
  • Advertising
  • Login
  • Join for Free

  •   Home > News > Living & Travel

    Pilots win retirement age appeal

    Two Kiwi pilots have successfully convinced New Zealand's Supreme Court that they should fly until they are 65.


    The Supreme Court has ruled that two New Zealand pilots were discriminated against due to age, and should be allowed to fly after they are 55.

    In 2014, the Employment Court ruled that senior pilots David Brown and Glen Sycamore were being discriminated against by being forced to retire at age 55, required by their 2002 contract with Cathay Pacific's subsidiary New Zealand Basing.

    Both pilots, who have flown for Cathay since the early 1990s, turned 55 in 2015.

    Restructuring for the company's pilots took place in 2008 and 2009 and it was agreed that local employment law for pilots from the UK, Canada and Australia was to be the rule - providing for retirement at 65 - but this was not the case for the 33 New Zealand pilots.

    Hong Kong law, where Cathay is based, does not prohibit discrimination by reason of age.

    NZ Basing appealed the Employment Court decision in the Appeal Court in 2016 and won, although Mr Brown and Mr Sycamore were granted leave to appeal.

    In a Supreme Court judgement released on Wednesday, five justices unanimously said that the Employment Court's decision - saying the duo could appeal the age limit under the provisions of New Zealand's Employment Relations Act - should be restored.

    They took the view that pilots weren't captured by any exceptions in the Human Rights Act and would fall within the Employment Relations Act.

    It would be "very odd" for the law to "allow discrimination in the employment context in relation to persons in the appellants' position, solely on the basis of the parties' choice of law," they said.

    The judges also set aside the Court of Appeal's costs order against the pilots, and ordered New Zealand Basing to pay the pilots' appeal court costs and the $25,000 for taking the case to the Supreme Court.

    © 2017 NZN, NZCity


     Other Living & Travel News
     24 Nov: NZ ex-priest in NSW court on sex charges
     23 Nov: Kiwi Bethune stabbed in Brazil
     22 Nov: Woman's body discovered in Christchurch
     22 Nov: Auckland's orangutans head to Christchurch
     22 Nov: Decline in 18-24 year olds drinking
     21 Nov: NZ Post to mark Queen's wedding milestone
     20 Nov: Polish tourist named as Coast crash victim
     Top Stories

    RUGBY RUGBY
    Simplicity key to last Test win: Whitelock More...


    BUSINESS BUSINESS
    Kiwi shoppers splurge ahead of Christmas More...



     Today's News

    International:
    Donald Trump tweets he'll 'probably' be named Time magazine's 2017 Person of the Year 14:37

    Entertainment:
    Liam Gallagher claims he is "fitter" than his brother Noel's wife 14:20

    Motorsports:
    McLaughlin grabs pole in Supercars battle 14:07

    Entertainment:
    Seth Meyers has been confirmed as host of the 2018 Golden Globe Awards 13:50

    Politics:
    Greenpeace calls on govt to stop oil ship 13:47

    Law and Order:
    AFP experts enhance footage of suspects in Indonesian acid attack on Novel Baswedan 13:37

    Motorsports:
    Supercars fans injured after V8 ute crash 13:27

    Entertainment:
    Denzel Washington thinks it's "crazy" Drake got a tattoo of his face 13:20

    Business:
    Kiwi shoppers splurge ahead of Christmas 13:07

    Entertainment:
    Camila Cabello has admitted she “hates” social media 12:50


     News Search






    Power Search


    © 2017 New Zealand City Ltd