News | Health & Safety
21 Apr 2018 8:31
NZCity News
NZCity CalculatorReturn to NZCity

  • Start Page
  • Personalise
  • Sport
  • Weather
  • Finance
  • Shopping
  • Jobs
  • Horoscopes
  • Lotto Results
  • Photo Gallery
  • Site Gallery
  • TVNow
  • Dating
  • SearchNZ
  • NZSearch
  • RugbyLeague
  • Make Home
  • About NZCity
  • Contact NZCity
  • Your Privacy
  • Advertising
  • Login
  • Join for Free

  •   Home > News > Health & Safety

    Removal of sperm from dead man allowed

    The High Court has decided sperm can removed from a dead man.

    The High Court has given belated permission for a woman to take sperm from a dead man so she can have his baby one day.

    In a judgment of Justice Paul Heath, released Wednesday, the High Court at Auckland has allowed a woman, only known as "Ms Long", to have sperm collected from her partner, Mr Lee.

    They are described in the judgment "as having been in a stable de facto relationship for some 20 years" and had a baby shortly after Mr Lee died.

    While Mr Lee had never expressed a desire for his sperm to be used posthumously, Justice Heath said "they always wanted their first child to have at least one sibling".

    "I have no doubt that Mr Lee and Ms Long, together with their respective extended families, intended to provide a stable and loving environment in which their children could be nurtured," Justice Heath says.

    "[However], the absence of evidence of express consent from Mr Lee to posthumous use of his sperm raises some important public considerations."

    At present there are no statutory or regulatory provisions that deal explicitly with the ability for a person in Ms Long's position to collect and use sperm from a dead partner.

    An urgent interim order was granted by the court, via the Coroner, to take sperm from Mr Lee within 48 hours of his death and, at a hearing held on October 30, Ms Long asked that it be used by her in fertility treatment.

    Before proceeding with such an application, Ms Lee first needed confirmation of the lawfulness of the initial removal, storage and custody of the sperm.

    Whether she is authorised to use her partner's sperm for her own fertility treatment at some future date is a matter for consideration by the Ethics Committee established under the Human Assisted Reproductive Technology Act 2004.

    The court decided that Ms Long was entitled to apply and the nature of the relationship would be considered by the committee.


    © 2018 NZN, NZCity

     Other Health & Safety News
     18 Apr: Woman pleads guilty to faking cancer after raising $45,000 from community
     18 Apr: Raw fruit and veg good for mental health
     16 Apr: NZ shares fall; Fletcher drops after surge
     16 Apr: Goff takes break as mayor after surgery
     16 Apr: Older Kiwis hurt in over 216,000 falls
     15 Apr: NZ lobby group queries booze study
     14 Apr: Middlemore to remain in use during repairs
     Top Stories

    Tahs look to get Izzy back after Super bye More...

    NZ shares fall as MSCI changes debated More...

     Today's News

    Vietnamese teen's escape from the China trafficking trade that sold her mother 8:26

    Rugby League:
    Smith credits Jacks for Munster's NRL form 8:16

    Henry stars for Kent in 'crazy' day 8:06

    Emily Ratajkowski loves being able to call her partner “husband” 8:01

    Rugby League:
    NRL backs controversial Slater try call 7:56

    Dunedin students set for Hyde Street party 7:46

    Tahs look to get Izzy back after Super bye 7:36

    Stefflon Don finds it hard to date, as boys find her “intimidating” 7:31

    Add Kiwis to Super W: Queensland coach 7:26

    One dead in Matamata wall crash 7:16

     News Search

    Power Search

    © 2018 New Zealand City Ltd