News | Features
12 Aug 2022 5:56
NZCity News
NZCity CalculatorReturn to NZCity

  • Start Page
  • Personalise
  • Sport
  • Weather
  • Finance
  • Shopping
  • Jobs
  • Horoscopes
  • Lotto Results
  • Photo Gallery
  • Site Gallery
  • TVNow
  • Dating
  • SearchNZ
  • NZSearch
  • Crime.co.nz
  • RugbyLeague
  • Make Home
  • About NZCity
  • Contact NZCity
  • Your Privacy
  • Advertising
  • Login
  • Join for Free

  •   Home > News > Business > Features

    The Investor Don’t Wait For Change On How Advisers Are Paid

    It’s one of those situations in which, 20 or 30 years from now, I reckon people will say, "I can’t believe they used to do it that way."


    I’m talking about the fact that companies that offer investments often pay financial advisers to sell their products to clients. There’s a clear incentive for advisers to recommend inferior investments because those companies pay them higher commissions.

    Many advisers say that, nevertheless, they choose the best investment for clients. But how can a client be sure? Adviser recommendations – including finance companies that later went belly up and other poor investments - have left many people in doubt.

    Recent changes should help with this. The code of conduct for authorised financial advisers says they must “place the interests of the client first”. And advisers can’t say they are independent if they are not.

    Also, they have to disclose all income – including entertainment and trips - they receive from financial product providers. But I’m not confident that clients fully grasp what the disclosure means, or realise they are simply not told about good investments that pay low or no commissions to the adviser.

    I would like to see an end to commissions and the like. Instead, clients would pay fees to advisers, just as we pay doctors and lawyers. Sure, clients would seem to be out of pocket. But if commissions disappeared, that money should turn into higher returns on investments. And – importantly - clients would invest in the best investments for them. The difference is likely to easily offset the fees over the years.

    It was encouraging, therefore, to see a recommendation along those lines in the Commerce Committee’s recent report on its inquiry into finance company failures.

    It’s a gently worded recommendation - that the government “investigate the possibility of banning conflicted remuneration structures in the provision of financial advice.”

    But it’s backed up elsewhere in the report. It discusses an adviser’s duty not to act if he or she “has any interest in the matter which could be in conflict with the interests of the client.” The relationship between adviser and client, “once established, cannot be avoided by mere disclosure of a conflict; the duty is not to act.”

    And I like the suggestion that the government investigation include “consultation with the Australian authorities on the model proposed in that country.” Not only Australia, but the UK and US are moving towards banning commissions.

    Why do we lag behind? In submissions to the Commerce Committee, “the point was made that investors are often reluctant to pay fees for advice, and fees would need to be higher in the absence of commissions,” says the report.

    But surely there’s something wrong if an adviser can’t show a client that they are worth their fee.

    I know of more than 30 financial advisory firms who already do that. They are listed on the Info on Advisers page on www.maryholm.com. All charge fees only – except with a few long-term clients who have opted for the old system. Those exceptions aside, if a provider gives these advisers a commission, they pass the money on to the client. That helps to offset the fees.

    With a growing number of advisers practising this way, and adviser organisations looking into the issue, perhaps commissions could cease without government intervention. But, says the report, “There is also a need for effort by the public … to be prepared to seek and pay for truly independent advice.”

    I suggest you don’t wait for the law to change. If you use an adviser, discuss switching to fees. If you’re looking for an adviser, go for one that charges fees.

    © 2022 Mary Holm, NZCity

     Other Features News
     10 Sep: Spring clean your finances
     13 Aug: Plan ahead to give yourself a debt-free Christmas!
     10 Jul: Wise up to clear credit card debt
     07 May: Ways to prepare for the unexpected
     30 Mar: Time for a financial progress check
     10 Feb: Studying up on NZ Super
     10 Jan: Managing the back-to-school bills
     Top Stories

    RUGBY RUGBY
    A clean bill of health for the All Blacks' sick bay patients More...


    BUSINESS BUSINESS
    Gas users and experts call for federal crackdown on east coast 'gas cartel' More...



     Today's News

    Politics:
    Senior Labour MPs are casting doubt over allegations of rampant bullying in Parliament 5:29

    Rugby:
    A clean bill of health for the All Blacks' sick bay patients 5:29

    Entertainment:
    Kim Kardashian is "very supportive" of Pete Davidson's decision to attend therapy 21:50

    Entertainment:
    Ben Affleck's house is for sale for $30 million 21:20

    Law and Order:
    A search continues for missing Waikanae Beach man 21:19

    International:
    The Loop: Defence royal commission interim report released, Donald Trump invokes the Fifth Amendment, and Spider-Man turns 60 21:09

    Entertainment:
    Normani has "real life s*** going on in [her] personal life" 20:50

    Entertainment:
    Raymond Briggs has died at the age of 88 20:20

    Entertainment:
    Olivia Wilde has won her custody battle against her ex Jason Sudeikis 19:50

    Entertainment:
    Anne Heche's son is advocating for her in hospital 19:20


     News Search






    Power Search


    © 2022 New Zealand City Ltd