News | Politics
19 Jul 2024 15:45
NZCity News
NZCity CalculatorReturn to NZCity

  • Start Page
  • Personalise
  • Sport
  • Weather
  • Finance
  • Shopping
  • Jobs
  • Horoscopes
  • Lotto Results
  • Photo Gallery
  • Site Gallery
  • TVNow
  • Dating
  • SearchNZ
  • NZSearch
  • Crime.co.nz
  • RugbyLeague
  • Make Home
  • About NZCity
  • Contact NZCity
  • Your Privacy
  • Advertising
  • Login
  • Join for Free

  •   Home > News > Politics

    Big tech companies were open to online safety regulation – why did NZ’s government scrap the idea?

    The government says the online safety framework infringed on free speech. But some of the world’s biggest tech companies have said they aren’t opposed to some form of regulation.

    Fiona Sing, Research Fellow, Population Health, University of Auckland, Waipapa Taumata Rau, Antonia Lyons, Professor of Addiction Research, University of Auckland, Waipapa Taumata Rau
    The Conversation


    The coalition government has scrapped efforts to modernise New Zealand’s out-of-date online safety rules, despite qualified support for change from social media and tech giants.

    The aim of the Safer Online Services and Media Platforms project, led by the Department of Internal Affairs, was to develop a new framework to regulate what can be published on online platforms and other forms of media (such as news) in New Zealand.

    It addressed the sharing of harmful online content such as child sexual exploitation, age-inappropriate material, bullying and harassment, the promotion of self-harm, and so on. It also aimed to generally improve the regulation of online services and media platforms.

    Announcing a halt to the project in May, Internal Affairs Minister Brooke van Velden argued that illegal content was already being policed, and the concepts of “harm” and “emotional wellbeing” were subjective and open to interpretation. She also said it was a matter of free speech.

    The principle of free speech is important to this coalition government and is an essential factor to consider in the digital world. On this basis, the Department will not be progressing with work to regulate online content.

    However, when we looked at submissions from tech and social media companies on the proposed framework, we found companies such as Facebook, Reddit and X (formerly Twitter) were broadly supportive of regulations – within certain limits.

    Brooke van Velden speaking to media in parliament
    Free speech important: Internal Affairs Minister Brooke van Velden. Getty Images

    Regulating online media

    The Safer Online Services and Media Platforms project had been in development since 2021. Internal Affairs invited public submissions last year.

    The proposed rules would have created a new, more streamlined industry regulation model. It proposed codes of practice governed by an independent regulator to control online harm and protect public safety. The safety standards would have applied to online and other media platforms.

    Currently, at least ten different government organisations have some level of responsibility for governing online services and responding to harmful content, often overlapping with each other. And some areas are barely regulated at all. Social media companies, for example, are not required under New Zealand law to meet safety standards.

    Other countries have also been looking at how to regulate harmful digital content, online services and media platforms. Ireland, Canada, the United Kingdom and Australia have all progressed a version of this law to regulate online spaces.

    Outdated regulations

    We examined the submissions from some of the dominant companies in the technology sector, including Google (including YouTube), Meta, Snap, Reddit, TikTok and X Corp. Our aim was to look at what these companies had to say about regulations that would directly affect their core business.

    All of them agreed the current system is outdated and needs revamping. Google, for example, argued:

    Content regulation has been developed for a different era of technology, focusing on mediums such as radio and television broadcasting. It is therefore appropriate that regulatory frameworks be updated to be fit for purpose to reflect both technological and societal changes.

    These companies have already introduced their own protection policies and signed up to the voluntary Aotearoa New Zealand code of practice for online safety and harms.

    Importantly, none of the companies argued their efforts towards self regulation were sufficient.

    The only option, according to these companies’ submissions, was a code focused on objectives and not hard rules that would be too prescriptive. Submissions insisted the new code had to be a “proportionate” system to implement and enforce.

    Snap stated that:

    online regulation is most effective when it is based on broad principles that companies of all sizes are able to follow and implement proportionately.

    Proportionality is usually a legal test used to decide whether a right, such as freedom of expression, can be limited in the interests of another public concern. However, only Meta and X Corp mentioned protecting freedom of expression in their submission.

    Most submissions stated they would trust an independent regulator to design one overarching code, with the caveat that the regulator needed to be truly independent from all industry actors and also the government of the day.

    Reddit stated:

    we are also concerned with the proposal for industry to develop codes of practice, rather than the government or an appropriate regulatory agency.

    Submissions also noted there needed to be consultation with industry actors throughout the design process.

    A missed opportunity

    In the submissions on the proposed regulatory framework, each of the companies had their own views on how codes should be designed, whether legal but harmful content would be included in an regulatory code, who should carry the burden of implementation, and what penalties should look like.

    But notably, they were all supportive of a regulatory overhaul.

    The decision to scrap the framework is a missed opportunity to protect future generations from some of the harms of online media.

    The Conversation

    The authors do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license.
    © 2024 TheConversation, NZCity

     Other Politics News
     19 Jul: An Auckland couple have been sent to prison for three years after spending up on jewellery and beauty salon visits instead of paying tax
     19 Jul: The PSA says the Government needs to have a major re-think over how it goes about its job cuts
     19 Jul: New data suggests there's increased demand for owning all kinds of small businesses
     18 Jul: A drop in sales forced a bike business owned by MP Darleen Tana's husband into liquidation
     18 Jul: Queen Camilla celebrates 77th birthday with historic Diamond Diadem
     18 Jul: Food for thought: how NZ’s school lunch programme can add learning and local economies to the menu
     17 Jul: Heated debate over potential changes to insulation and double glazing regulation
     Top Stories

    RUGBY RUGBY
    Former All Blacks halfback Justin Marshall has no qualms about Cortez Ratima and Noah Hotham combining in the role tomorrow afternoon against Fiji More...


    BUSINESS BUSINESS
    Good news for home-buyers.... BNZ and Kiwibank are following ANZ and Westpac in cutting their advertised home loan and term deposit rates, following Wednesday's drop in CPI inflation More...



     Today's News

    Entertainment:
    Christina and Josh Hall "had issues in the marriage for quite some time" before their shock split 15:28

    Politics:
    An Auckland couple have been sent to prison for three years after spending up on jewellery and beauty salon visits instead of paying tax 15:27

    Entertainment:
    AnnaLynne McCord has paid tribute to Shannen Doherty 14:58

    Law and Order:
    A third man's been charged with murder, in relation to the death of South Canterbury man, Anaru Moana 14:57

    International:
    Live updates: Donald Trump addresses Republican National Convention, Joe Biden 'soul-searching', US media reports 14:47

    Entertainment:
    Firerose has been banned from using Billy Ray Cyrus' credit cards 14:28

    Cricket:
    New Zealand Cricket remains adamant the White Ferns are moving in the right direction... despite eight defeats in a row in their white-ball tour of England 14:08

    Health & Safety:
    Ethnicity, equality and Pharmac: how the Treaty really guides NZ’s drug-buying policies 14:08

    Motoring:
    Motorists are being urged to take extra care tonight with rough weather on the way in some places 14:08

    Entertainment:
    Richard Simmons' family are "overwhelmed and beyond grateful" for the "outpouring of love" sparked by his death 13:58


     News Search






    Power Search


    © 2024 New Zealand City Ltd