News | National
21 Jun 2024 17:53
NZCity News
NZCity CalculatorReturn to NZCity

  • Start Page
  • Personalise
  • Sport
  • Weather
  • Finance
  • Shopping
  • Jobs
  • Horoscopes
  • Lotto Results
  • Photo Gallery
  • Site Gallery
  • TVNow
  • Dating
  • SearchNZ
  • NZSearch
  • Crime.co.nz
  • RugbyLeague
  • Make Home
  • About NZCity
  • Contact NZCity
  • Your Privacy
  • Advertising
  • Login
  • Join for Free

  •   Home > News > National

    How to end the wasteful boom-bust cycle driving NZ’s infrastructure gap: new report

    A report released next week argues the real problem with New Zealand’s inadequate infrastructure is not money – it’s the three-year political cycle. We need a 30-year, cross-party national plan.

    Timothy Welch, Senior Lecturer in Urban Planning, University of Auckland, Waipapa Taumata Rau
    The Conversation


    InterIslander
    InterIslander

    Debates about infrastructure often turn around money – with good reason. It’s estimated New Zealand’s infrastructure deficit – the amount we would need to spend to modernise, upgrade and build what we need today – is more than NZ$100 billion.

    And this will double by 2030 if we don’t significantly increase spending now to avoid the even higher cost of falling further behind and having to catch up.

    These are big numbers, but they are just numbers. The real problem is political. No matter which major party is in office, no recent government has seriously addressed the country’s long-term infrastructure needs.

    Priorities should include modernising water systems to prevent leaks and contamination, expanding and improving road and rail networks to reduce congestion and support economic growth, and ensuring infrastructure can withstand the impacts of climate change and natural disasters.

    Next week’s budget seems likely to continue the trend. Spending and tax cuts, and reducing debt, have already been well signalled. Building a few more big roads and installing tunnels and pipes is no substitute for what is truly required.

    A report made available to media today from the Helen Clark Foundation and environmental consulting firm WSP – Bridging the Infrastructure Gap: Funding and Financing Aotearoa New Zealand – argues there is a better way. Central to this will be greater political consensus and longer-term planning.

    slips on Auckland cliff with houses at top
    Land slips from the 2023 Auckland flood: long-term resilience to climate change needs long-term planning. Getty Images

    Wasteful and unproductive

    While there are several ways to fund infrastructure, the report argues a significant portion will need debt financing. And it reminds us New Zealand is still a reasonably low-debt nation.

    As of 2022, Crown debt sat at around 57% of GDP, compared to an OECD average of 89%. Given the strong Crown balance sheet, there is capacity for further government borrowing for infrastructure projects.

    As the report argues, however, money isn’t the real problem – political willpower is. Above all, there is a lack of multiparty support for prioritising a resilient future.

    This became starkly evident with the recent change of government. Since the National-led coalition took office, we’ve seen infrastructure project cancellations and a significant shift in funding priorities.

    As the Clark Foundation report highlights, the incoming government cancelled the iReX interisland ferry terminal project after $424 million had already been spent. Similarly, the previous Labour-led governments cancelled eight major road projects. Some of these have now been reinstated at a significantly higher cost.

    This boom-bust cycle is wasteful and unproductive. The report emphasises the need for a stable, long-term vision supported by consistent investment levels across successive government terms.

    Historically, this cycle has also led to many infrastructure assets reaching the end of their lives all at once. The need for substantial repairs or replacement leads in turn to urgent spending that could be avoided with better planning.

    Big savings available

    The lack of a long-term vision carries other costs, too. The decisions made today will affect multiple future generations. It is irresponsible to make critical, long-term, high-impact decisions about vital infrastructure on a three-year political cycle.

    The Clark Foundation report recommends developing a 30-year national infrastructure plan. Not only would this provide greater certainty, it would unlock productivity benefits that could save between 13% and 26.5% on project costs.

    But spending more and building more isn’t the only way to sustain infrastructure. We also need to use – and charge for – existing infrastructure more efficiently. There are examples of this already, such as a planned time-of-use charge for some Auckland roads, but far more can be done.

    Other possibilities include new highway tolls and more targeted water-use charges. For instance, “volumetric charging” – metering – for water has had significant success on the Kapiti Coast where it led to a 90% reduction in water lost to leakage, and a 26% decrease in private water use.

    Hong Kong’s MTR transit system is an example of value-capture funding for infrastructure. Getty Images

    Transcending the political cycle

    There are also more innovative and equitable ways to fund infrastructure that have long been used globally, including what is known as “value capture”. This is where an increase in rates revenue resulting from an infrastructure investment is used to fund or offset some of the cost of the infrastructure itself.

    For example, in the United States, value-capture mechanisms were integral to funding the development of the Atlanta BeltLine, a 35-kilometre walking and cycling path, and eventual light rail route. Capturing the increase in property values along the corridor provided 40% of the project’s US$4.8 billion cost.

    Hong Kong’s Mass Transit Railway (MTR) Corporation has successfully used value capture through land premiums and property development to fund its extensive rail network.

    And in London, the Crossrail project (also known as the Elizabeth Line) partially funded its construction through a business rate supplement and a community infrastructure levy targeting properties that would benefit from the new rail line.

    In New Zealand, targeted rates – a form of value capture – have been successfully used to fund projects such as the $400 Moa Point Sludge Minimisation Facility in Wellington. Financed through a levy on all city properties (excluding protected Maori land), the cost is spread over the life of the new facility.

    It is not that feasible funding solutions for significant infrastructure investments don’t exist. Rather, as the Helen Clark Foundation and WSP report makes clear, it is the lack of a long-term plan transcending the political cycle that is holding the country back.


    Bridging the Infrastructure Gap: Funding and Financing Aotearoa New Zealand will be publicly available on June 26.


    The Conversation

    Timothy Welch does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license.
    © 2024 TheConversation, NZCity

     Other National News
     21 Jun: The Electricity Authority says Northlanders deserve answers - as it launches an investigation into a toppled electricity tower
     21 Jun: Does One NZ’s new ad campaign connect? Many adopted people might not think so
     21 Jun: Auckland Police are on the lookout for an alleged million dollar fraudster
     21 Jun: We discovered Raja Ampat’s reef manta rays prefer staying close to home – which could help us save more of them
     21 Jun: Metlink has spoken about its handling of the public transport system during sporting events in Wellington
     21 Jun: Worksafe says a motorcyclist is lucky to be alive after crashing into bungy ropes, suspended across a 100-k West Coast public road
     21 Jun: Should we ditch BMI and use the ‘body roundness index’ instead?
     Top Stories

    RUGBY RUGBY
    He may have left nearly 1000 caps of experience out of his playing squad for the Olympics, but All Blacks Sevens coach Tomasi Cama believes old heads will still be vital in Paris More...


    BUSINESS BUSINESS
    Resource management is always political – the Fast-track Approvals Bill is just honest about it More...



     Today's News

    Entertainment:
    Halle Berry brought a touch of Hollywood glamour to the Olympic torch relay by carrying the flame along the streets of Cannes 17:46

    General:
    Olympic gold medallists Phillip Wilson and Dan Williamson have finally been named as the men's pair in the New Zealand Rowing team for next month's Games 17:27

    Entertainment:
    Travis Kelce loves to make homemade shrimp linguine for girlfriend Taylor Swift 17:16

    Soccer:
    The All Whites lead Vanuatu 2-nil at halftime, in their final group game at the OFC Nations Cup in Port Vila 16:57

    Rugby:
    He may have left nearly 1000 caps of experience out of his playing squad for the Olympics, but All Blacks Sevens coach Tomasi Cama believes old heads will still be vital in Paris 16:57

    Law and Order:
    A stark warning young children should never be left unsupervised in child restraints -- no matter how long 16:47

    Entertainment:
    Sarah Ferguson has shut down rumours she could re-marry Prince Andrew 16:46

    International:
    There are ways to garden with a bad back. Here's what a physiotherapist recommends 16:27

    Environment:
    Amid scorching heat, 900 people died this week in Saudi Arabia. Climate change has made the Hajj pilgrimage more risky 16:17

    Entertainment:
    Kevin Costner has insisted he isn't dating Jewel 16:16


     News Search






    Power Search


    © 2024 New Zealand City Ltd