News | Politics
13 Jul 2024 17:30
NZCity News
NZCity CalculatorReturn to NZCity

  • Start Page
  • Personalise
  • Sport
  • Weather
  • Finance
  • Shopping
  • Jobs
  • Horoscopes
  • Lotto Results
  • Photo Gallery
  • Site Gallery
  • TVNow
  • Dating
  • SearchNZ
  • NZSearch
  • RugbyLeague
  • Make Home
  • About NZCity
  • Contact NZCity
  • Your Privacy
  • Advertising
  • Login
  • Join for Free

  •   Home > News > Politics

    Big tech companies were open to online safety regulation – why did NZ’s government scrap the idea?

    The government says the online safety framework infringed on free speech. But some of the world’s biggest tech companies have said they aren’t opposed to some form of regulation.

    Fiona Sing, Research Fellow, Population Health, University of Auckland, Waipapa Taumata Rau, Antonia Lyons, Professor of Addiction Research, University of Auckland, Waipapa Taumata Rau
    The Conversation

    The coalition government has scrapped efforts to modernise New Zealand’s out-of-date online safety rules, despite qualified support for change from social media and tech giants.

    The aim of the Safer Online Services and Media Platforms project, led by the Department of Internal Affairs, was to develop a new framework to regulate what can be published on online platforms and other forms of media (such as news) in New Zealand.

    It addressed the sharing of harmful online content such as child sexual exploitation, age-inappropriate material, bullying and harassment, the promotion of self-harm, and so on. It also aimed to generally improve the regulation of online services and media platforms.

    Announcing a halt to the project in May, Internal Affairs Minister Brooke van Velden argued that illegal content was already being policed, and the concepts of “harm” and “emotional wellbeing” were subjective and open to interpretation. She also said it was a matter of free speech.

    The principle of free speech is important to this coalition government and is an essential factor to consider in the digital world. On this basis, the Department will not be progressing with work to regulate online content.

    However, when we looked at submissions from tech and social media companies on the proposed framework, we found companies such as Facebook, Reddit and X (formerly Twitter) were broadly supportive of regulations – within certain limits.

    Brooke van Velden speaking to media in parliament
    Free speech important: Internal Affairs Minister Brooke van Velden. Getty Images

    Regulating online media

    The Safer Online Services and Media Platforms project had been in development since 2021. Internal Affairs invited public submissions last year.

    The proposed rules would have created a new, more streamlined industry regulation model. It proposed codes of practice governed by an independent regulator to control online harm and protect public safety. The safety standards would have applied to online and other media platforms.

    Currently, at least ten different government organisations have some level of responsibility for governing online services and responding to harmful content, often overlapping with each other. And some areas are barely regulated at all. Social media companies, for example, are not required under New Zealand law to meet safety standards.

    Other countries have also been looking at how to regulate harmful digital content, online services and media platforms. Ireland, Canada, the United Kingdom and Australia have all progressed a version of this law to regulate online spaces.

    Outdated regulations

    We examined the submissions from some of the dominant companies in the technology sector, including Google (including YouTube), Meta, Snap, Reddit, TikTok and X Corp. Our aim was to look at what these companies had to say about regulations that would directly affect their core business.

    All of them agreed the current system is outdated and needs revamping. Google, for example, argued:

    Content regulation has been developed for a different era of technology, focusing on mediums such as radio and television broadcasting. It is therefore appropriate that regulatory frameworks be updated to be fit for purpose to reflect both technological and societal changes.

    These companies have already introduced their own protection policies and signed up to the voluntary Aotearoa New Zealand code of practice for online safety and harms.

    Importantly, none of the companies argued their efforts towards self regulation were sufficient.

    The only option, according to these companies’ submissions, was a code focused on objectives and not hard rules that would be too prescriptive. Submissions insisted the new code had to be a “proportionate” system to implement and enforce.

    Snap stated that:

    online regulation is most effective when it is based on broad principles that companies of all sizes are able to follow and implement proportionately.

    Proportionality is usually a legal test used to decide whether a right, such as freedom of expression, can be limited in the interests of another public concern. However, only Meta and X Corp mentioned protecting freedom of expression in their submission.

    Most submissions stated they would trust an independent regulator to design one overarching code, with the caveat that the regulator needed to be truly independent from all industry actors and also the government of the day.

    Reddit stated:

    we are also concerned with the proposal for industry to develop codes of practice, rather than the government or an appropriate regulatory agency.

    Submissions also noted there needed to be consultation with industry actors throughout the design process.

    A missed opportunity

    In the submissions on the proposed regulatory framework, each of the companies had their own views on how codes should be designed, whether legal but harmful content would be included in an regulatory code, who should carry the burden of implementation, and what penalties should look like.

    But notably, they were all supportive of a regulatory overhaul.

    The decision to scrap the framework is a missed opportunity to protect future generations from some of the harms of online media.

    The Conversation

    The authors do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license.
    © 2024 TheConversation, NZCity

     Other Politics News
     13 Jul: Confidence leaving public consultation out of Wairoa's flood review wont impact its findings
     13 Jul: An Australian RTD brand is still selling it's products here despite it's appeal to minors
     13 Jul: Hundreds of employers are under a migrant hiring freeze after an issue with Immigration NZ's IT system
     13 Jul: Labour is daring National to put its stake in the ground over an Act member's bill on climate change
     12 Jul: A nation reinvented: 40 years on from its 1984 victory, the Fourth Labour Government still defines NZ
     12 Jul: Chris Luxon's taken a leap as preferred Prime Minister -- according to a Taxpayers' Union Curia poll
     12 Jul: Anxiety as Morrison-era Cashless Debit Card is flagged as possibly returning amid cost-of-living crisis
     Top Stories

    Any sign of uncertainty from England over the All Blacks' game plan has disappeared, heading into tonight's second test at Eden Park More...

    ew electric passenger trains have arrived in Auckland - with more due over the next few weeks More...

     Today's News

    Law and Order:
    A judge has called a Waikato man a coward, after punching his 30-week pregnant partner 17:27

    Prince William "truly" believes homelessness can be "ended" 17:04

    The struggling Southern Steel netball side are searching for a new coach 16:57

    Meghan, Duchess of Sussex is said to be "very pleased" with the "strong start" for American Riviera Orchard 16:34

    The Black Foils are trying to keep things on an even keel ahead of this weekend's SailGP final in San Francisco 16:17

    Any sign of uncertainty from England over the All Blacks' game plan has disappeared, heading into tonight's second test at Eden Park 16:07

    Meta lifts restrictions on Donald Trump's Facebook and Instagram accounts 16:07

    Pete Davidson has split from Madelyn Cline 16:04

    Retired Silver Fern Sulu Fitzpatrick believes this afternoon's ANZ Premiership showdown between the Mystics and Central Pulse on the North Shore is the biggest match of the netball season to date 15:57

    Kris Jenner has undergone a hysterectomy, after a tumour was discovered on her ovary 15:34

     News Search

    Power Search

    © 2024 New Zealand City Ltd