Foreign interference, espionage, and online radicalisation threats have increased since last year, the Security Intelligence Service says. Read...

Modern notebooks with integrated AI hardware are changing the way artificial intelligence is used in everyday life. Instead of relying on external server farms, these large language models, image generators, or transcription systems run directly on the user’s own device. This is made possible by the combination of powerful CPUs, dedicated graphics processors and, at the center of this development, a Neural Processing Unit (NPU). An NPU is not just an add-on, but a specialized accelerator designed precisely for the calculation of neural networks. It enables offline AI tools such as GPT4All or Stable Diffusion not only to start, but also to react with high performance, low energy consumption and constant response time. Even with complex queries or multimodal tasks, the working speed remains stable. The days when AI was only conceivable as a cloud service are now over. Work where others are offline As soon as the internet connection is interrupted, classic laptops begin to idle. An AI PC, on the other hand, remains operational, whether in airplane mode above the clouds, deep in the dead zones of rural regions, or in an overloaded train network without a stable network. In such situations, the structural advantage of locally running AI systems becomes apparent. Jan.ai or GPT4All can be used to create, check and revise texts, intelligently summarize notes, pre-formulate emails and categorize appointments. Foundry With AnythingLLM, contracts or meeting minutes can be searched for keywords without the documents leaving the device. Creative tasks such as creating illustrations via Stable Diffusion or post-processing images with Photo AI also work, even on devices without a permanent network connection. Even demanding projects such as programming small tools or the automated generation of shell scripts are possible if the corresponding models are installed. For frequent travelers, project managers, or creative professionals, this creates a comprehensive option for productive working, completely independent of infrastructure, network availability, or cloud access. An offline AI notebook does not replace a studio, but it does prevent downtime. Sensitive content remains local Data sovereignty is increasingly becoming a decisive factor in personal and professional lives. Anyone who processes business reports, develops project ideas, or analyzes medical issues cannot afford to have any uncertainties when processing data. Public chatbots such as Gemini, ChatGPT, or Microsoft Copilot are helpful, but are not designed to protect sensitive data from misuse or unwanted analysis. Local AI solutions, on the other hand, work without transmitting data to the internet. The models used, such as LLaMA, Mistral or DeepSeek, can be executed directly on the device without the content leaving the hardware. This opens up completely new fields of application, particularly in areas with regulatory requirements, such as healthcare, in a legal context, or in research. AnythingLLM goes one step further. It combines classic chat interaction with a local knowledge base of Office documents, PDFs and structured data. This turns voice AI into an interactive analysis tool for complex amounts of information, locally, offline and in compliance with data protection regulations. NPU notebooks: new architecture, new possibilities While traditional notebooks quickly reach their thermal or energy limits in AI applications, the new generation of copilot PCs rely on specialized AI hardware. Models such as the Surface Laptop 6 or the Surface Pro 10 integrate a dedicated NPU directly into the Intel Core Ultra SoC, supplemented by high-performance CPU cores and integrated graphics. The advantages are evident in typical everyday scenarios. Voice input via Copilot, Gemini or ChatGPT can be analyzed without delay, image processing with AI tools takes place without cloud rendering, and even multimodal tasks, such as analyzing text, sound, and video simultaneously run in real time. Microsoft couples the hardware closely with the operating system. IDG Windows 11 offers native NPU support, for example for Windows Studio Effects, live subtitles, automatic text recognition in images or voice focus in video conferences. The systems are designed so that AI does not function as an add-on, but is an integral part of the overall system as soon as it is switched on, even without an internet connection. Productive despite dead zones The tools for offline AI are now fully developed and stable in everyday use. GPT4All from Nomic AI is particularly suitable for beginners, with a user-friendly interface, uncomplicated model management and support for numerous LLMs. Ollama is aimed at technically experienced users and offers terminal-based model management with a local API connection, ideal for providing your own applications or workflows directly with AI support. LM Studio, on the other hand, is characterized by its GUI focus. Models from Hugging Face can be simply be searched in the app, downloaded, and activated with a click. The LM Studio chatbot not only provides access to a large selection of AI models from Huggingface.com, but also allows the AI models to be fine-tuned. There is a separate developer view for this. LM Studio Jan.ai is particularly versatile. The minimalist interface hides a highly functional architecture with support for multiple models, context-sensitive responses, and elegant interaction. Local tools are also available in the creative area. With suitable hardware, Stable Diffusion delivers AI-generated images within a few seconds, while applications such as Photo AI automatically improve the quality of screenshots or video frames. A powerful NPU PC turns the mobile device into an autonomous creative studio, even without Wi-Fi, cloud access, or GPU calculation on third-party servers. What counts on the move The decisive factor for mobile use is not just whether a notebook can run AI, but how confidently it can do this offline. In addition to the CPU and GPU, the NPU plays a central role. It processes AI tasks in real time, while at the same time conserving battery power and reducing the load on the overall system. Devices such as the Galaxy Book with an RTX 4050/4070 or the Surface Pro 10 with a Intel Core Ultra 7 CPU demonstrate that even complex language models such as Phi-2, Mistral, or Qwen run locally, with smooth operation and without the typical latencies of cloud services. Copilot as a system assistant complements this setup, provided the software can access it. When travelling, you can compose emails, structure projects, prepare images or generate text modules, regardless of the network. Offline AI on NPU notebooks also transforms the in-flight restaurant, the waiting gate, or the remote holiday home into a productive workspace. Requirements and limitations The hardware requirements are not trivial however. Models such as LLaMA2 or Mistral require several gigabytes of RAM, 16 GB RAM is the lower minimum. Those working with larger prompts or context windows should plan for 32 or 64 GB. The SSD memory requirement also increases, as many models use between 4 and 20 GB. NPUs take care of inference, but depending on the tool, additional GPU support may be necessary, for example for image generation with Stable Diffusion. Sam Singleton Integration into the operating system is also important. Copilot PCs ensure deep integration between hardware, AI libraries, and system functions. Anyone working with older hardware will have to accept limitations. The model quality also varies. Local LLMs do not yet consistently reach the level of GPT-4, but they are more controllable, more readily available and more data protection-friendly. They are the more robust solution for many applications, especially when travelling. Offline AI under Linux: openness meets control Offline AI also unfolds its potential on Linux systems—often with even greater flexibility. Tools such as Ollama, GPT4All, or LM Studio offer native support for Ubuntu, Fedora, and Arch-based distributions and can be installed directly from the terminal or as a flatpack. The integration of open models such as Mistral, DeepSeek, or LLaMA works smoothly, as many projects rely on open source frameworks such as GGML or llama.cpp. Browser interface for Ollama: Open-Web-UI is quickly set up as a Python program or in a Docker container and provides a user interface.IDG Anyone working with Docker or Conda environments can build customized model set-ups, activate GPU support or fine-tune inference parameters. This opens up various scenarios, especially in the developer environment: Scripting, data analysis, code completion, or testing your own prompt structures. In conjunction with tiling desktops, reduced background processes and optimized energy management, the Linux notebook becomes a self-sufficient AI platform, without any vendor lock-in, with maximum control over every file and every computing operation. Offline instead of delivered Offline AI on NPU notebooks is not a stopgap measure, but a paradigm shift. It offers independence, data protection, and responsiveness, even in environments without a network. Thanks to specialized chips, optimized software, and well thought-out integration in Windows 11 and the latest Linux kernel, new freedom is created for data-secure analyses, mobile creative processes, or productive work beyond the cloud. The prerequisite for this is an AI PC that not only provides the necessary performance, but also anchors AI at a system level. Anyone relying on reliable intelligence on the move should no longer hope for the cloud, but choose a notebook that makes it superfluous. Read...

At a glanceExpert`s Rating Pros Tack-sharp 6K resolution at a new low price Attractive design and highly functional stand Thunderbolt 4 with some downstream USB connectivity Many image quality options Great brightness and good color performance Cons Modest contrast ratio HDR is supported but doesn’t look its best Only 60Hz with limited Adaptive Sync support Our Verdict The Asus ProArt PA32QCV delivers incredible 6K sharpness at a much lower price than its predecessors. It also provides other perks, like Thunderbolt 4 connectivity and good color performance. Price When Reviewed This value will show the geolocated pricing text for product undefined Best Pricing Today Best Prices Today: Asus ProArt PA32QCV Retailer Price Check Price comparison from over 24,000 stores worldwide Product Price Price comparison from Backmarket Best Prices Today: Check today’s prices Finally, a full seven years after the release of Apple’s 6K Pro Display HDR, the floodgates holding back waves of 6K monitors have broken. While a few were released in prior years, such as the Dell Ultrasharp U3224KB, 2025 is seeing the arrival of many new options. One of these is the Asus ProArt PA32QCV, a 32-inch 6K monitor meant for professionals, creatives, and prosumers that retails at an MSRP of $1,399. Though certainly not inexpensive, the ProArt PA32QCV is much more affordable than the 6K monitors available a few years ago—and still provides solid image quality. Asus ProArt PA32QCV specs and features The Asus ProArt PA32QCV’s headline feature is, of course, its resolution. The monitor has a native resolution of 6016×3384 across a 31.5-inch panel with a 16:9 aspect ratio. It’s technically slightly lower in resolution than some prior 6K monitors, like the Dell U3224KB, which had a resolution of 6144×3456. But the PA32QCV’s resolution is a match for the Apple Pro Display XDR. That’s important, Mac users are a clear target audience for the monitor. Display size: 31.5-inch 16:9 aspect ratio Native resolution: 6016×3384 Panel type: IPS-LCD Refresh rate: 60Hz Adaptive sync: VESA MediaSync HDR: Yes, HDR10, VESA DisplayHDR 600 certified Ports: 1x Thunderbolt 4-in with 96 watts of Power Delivery, 1x Thunderbolt 4-out, 1x DisplayPort 1.4, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x USB-A 3.2 Gen 1 downstream, 2x USB-C 3.2 Gen 1 downstream, 3.5mm audio jack Audio: 2x 2-watt speakers Additional features: KVM switch, ambient light sensor, ambient color sensor Warranty: 3-year manufacturer warranty Price: $1,399.99 MSRP The ProArt PA32QCV also packs a strong complement of ports. It offers a Thunderbolt 4 port which can also provide 96 watts of Power Delivery, which is well-suited for powering Apple’s MacBooks and most mid-range Windows laptops. It also has several downstream USB ports and Thunderbolt 4-out, which can be used for a daisy-chain connection to another monitor. Asus ProArt PA32QCV design Asus’ ProArt design language has established itself in recent years. Most ProArt monitors have a conservative and professional look, with high-end models like the PA32QCV adding to that with a distinctive, heatsink-like design on the rear of the display. It’s attractive, but still subtle, and well-suited for a professional monitor. Foundry / Matt Smith The ProArt PA32QCV ships with an excellent stand. It has up to 130mm height adjustment, which is a bit more than the typical 110mm of adjustment. That’s important, not only because of the greater height range, but also because it gives the monitor room to pivot 90 degrees into portrait orientation. Most 32-inch displays can’t pivot, or if they do, can’t pivot the full 90 degrees. The stand also provides 60 degrees of swivel and 28 degrees of tilt—both are above-average. The stand base is a bit larger and will take up considerable space on a desk, but the base is flat, so items can still be placed on the space the stand occupies. The stand has an unusual three-piece design (most are in two pieces), but can still be assembled without tools. A 100x100mm VESA mount is found on the back of the monitor for use with third-party monitor stands and arms. Asus ProArt PA32QCV connectivity The Asus ProArt PA32QCV provides a good range of connectivity. It includes a Thunderbolt 4 port which also provides up to 96 watts of Power Delivery. This clearly sets the Mac audience in Asus’ crosshairs, as this is enough to handle the most powerful MacBook Pro laptops. It’s joined by a second Thunderbolt 4-out port with 15 watts of power. Daisy-chain connections are supported, meaning the Thunderbolt 4-out can be used to bridge a Thunderbolt video connection to a second monitor. The Thunderbolt 4 input is joined by HDMI 2.1 and DisplayPort 1.4 for a total of three video inputs. Technically, the monitor has four USB ports, two USB-A and two USB-C. They operate at USB 3.2 Gen 1 speeds, which means a data rate of 5Gbps. That’s pretty typical for a monitor, but it’s worth mentioning given the Thunderbolt 4 support, as it means you’ll really want to stick to Thunderbolt 4 for connecting any high-speed external media. A KVM switch function is available, so you can use the USB ports with a wired keyboard and mouse to quickly switch inputs between machines. A 3.5mm audio-out jack rounds out the connectivity. The ProArt PA32QCV’s connectivity doesn’t quite match leaders like the Dell U3225QE, which provides more Power Delivery and Ethernet, among other advantages. Still, the PA32QCV’s connectivity is well above average and useful for extending connectivity to multiple wired peripherals. Asus ProArt PA32QCV menus, features, and audio Like other Asus ProArt monitors, the PA32QCV makes the uncommon choice to place the menu controls on the front lower-right bezel. Most monitors hide these controls around the back of a monitor. While it’s not as attractive, placing the controls in plain sight makes them easier to use. That’s important for a professional monitor like the PA32QCV, as it’s likely that owners will want to change monitor settings frequently. Foundry / Matt Smith Alternatively, most monitor features can be changed with Asus’ DisplayWidget Center. The software is available for both Windows 11 and macOS. It’s attractive, easy to use, and in most cases preferable to using the physical menu controls. A few competitors, most notably BenQ, ship professional monitors with physical remotes that can be used to adjust the monitor. They’re nice to have, but I found the PA32QCV easy enough to adjust. And there are a lot of options to dig into. The monitor has numerous preset modes that target specific color spaces, as well as user modes that allow significant color customization. The monitor also includes color temperature modes that target specific values in degrees Kelvin and five gamma modes from gamma 1.8 to gamma 2.4. An ambient light sensor is included, too, though it’s turned off by default. The light sensor will automatically adjust the display’s brightness as the brightness of your room changes, which is helpful for maintaining a comfortable brightness level throughout the day. It supports automatic color temperature adjustment, too. The monitor’s automatic brightness adjustments were subtle, so I rarely noticed them, but the color temperature adjustments were often noticeable, and I ultimately decided to turn off that feature. Last, but not least, Asus provides some features targeted at Macs, specifically. This includes the ability to control the display brightness with a Mac keyboard and a “M Model-P3” color preset meant to match that of macOS devices. The pixel count is a match for the Apple Pro Display XDR, too, so macOS visuals scale perfectly. A pair of 2-watt speakers provide audio. The speakers provide reasonable volume and are useful for watching a YouTube video or listening to a podcast. Music, games, and movies will overwhelm them, though—so keep a pair of headphones handy. If you want a monitor to use in a very bright environment, the PA32QCV is a top choice. It even has a matte finish that keeps glare to a minimum. Asus ProArt PA32QCV SDR image quality Despite the prevalence of HDR, SDR remains where it’s at for most content viewed and created on a PC or Mac. From digital art to photography and even most video content, SDR is dominant because of its lower barrier to entry, lack of proper support on some devices, or lack of relevance to certain creative fields. That means SDR performance is critical for the Asus ProArt PA32QCV. Foundry / Matt Smith First up is brightness and—wait, hold up. Over 700 nits? Yes, indeed, the Asus ProArt PA32QCV can ramp up to unparalleled levels of SDR brightness. Indeed, it’s arguable that this level of brightness is complete overkill for most situations. But if you want a monitor to use in a very bright environment, well, the PA32QCV is a top choice. It even has a matte finish that keeps glare to a minimum. Asus is smart about how the brightness is implemented, too. A maximum brightness this high can be a problem if the monitor’s brightness controls are inadequate. But Asus solves this with a brightness control that has 400 levels of control, rather than the 100 levels most monitors offer. That means the monitor can be very bright, or quite dim, and everything in between. Alternatively, you can engage the ambient light sensor and let the monitor handle brightness control for you. Foundry / Matt Smith Contrast, on the other hand, is a big weakness of the ProArt PA32QCV. That’s not a surprise. The monitor has an IPS-LCD panel with a conventional edge-lit backlight. Given the monitor’s price and resolution, it would be a bit unreasonable to expect a mini-LED backlight (and OLED monitors are not yet available at this resolution, period). Still, the proliferation of 32-inch 4K OLED monitors will leave many shoppers facing a critical decision. Should you opt for OLED’s better contrast, which offers more immersive and dynamic visuals? Or go for a flatter, low-contrast image with excellent sharpness? If it were my money, I would choose a 6K IPS monitor for office productivity and photography, but an OLED if I worked with video (particularly HDR video) or wanted to play games. Your mileage may vary. Foundry / Matt Smith The ProArt PA32QVC provides a color gamut that spans 100 percent of sRGB, 98 percent of DCI-P3, and 87 percent of AdobeRGB. That’s a wide color gamut useful for most creative workflows, though some creative professionals might find the AdobeRGB gamut a bit lacking. Many similarly priced 4K alternatives, from OLED displays like the Asus ProArt PA32UCDM to IPS displays like the BenQ PD3226G, provide better coverage of the AdobeRGB color gamut. Foundry / Matt Smith Next up is color accuracy. The ProArt PA32QVC does well here—a few years back, an average color error value this low would be considered exceptional. In 2025, though, it’s basically par for any high-end monitor. The PA32QVC is good but not any better than competitors. With that said, it does provide an advantage in color temperature and gamma. The color temperature was spot-on the target value of 6500K. The same was true for the gamma curve of 2.2. That’s worth mention, as many OLED monitors tend to skew towards gamma 2.3, which indicates content viewed on those displays will look a tad darker than it should. It’s not really an issue outside of work where accuracy is a priority—but then again, that’s exactly the kind of work the PA32QVC is meant to accomplish. The PA32QVC’s other gamma settings, from 1.8 to 2.4, are also highly accurate. And now we come to sharpness which, of course, will often be the primary reason to buy the PA32QVC over an alternative. The monitor’s 6K (6016×3384) resolution across a 31.5-inch panel works out to a pixel density of about 219 pixels per inch. That’s much better than a 31.5-inch 4K monitor, which has about 140 pixels per inch. The PA32QVC’s sharpness advantage isn’t obvious when viewing a YouTube video or browsing a website, but it does come across when viewing a high-resolution photo, or even when browsing a high-quality PDF document. The resolution is also clearly meant to target Mac users, since MacOS is optimized for resolutions up to 6K. I spent most of my time using the PA32QVC with a Mac and found it rendered the MacOS user interface beautifully. Asus ProArt PA32QCV HDR image quality The Asus ProArt PA32QCV supports HDR10 and is VESA DisplayHDR 600 certified. It also provides respectable real-world HDR brightness with up to 682 nits. That’s not going to rival even most mid-range HDTVs, but it’s rather good for a monitor. Foundry / Matt Smith However, the ProArt PA32QCV suffers problems typical of an IPS-LCD display without a mini-LED backlight. The backlight can only increase the display brightness by lighting the entire display, so contrast remains limited. It’s particularly noticeable in dark scenes with bright highlights. The PA32QCV does have a dynamic backlight feature that can turn elements of the edge-lit backlight on and off. It’s very limited, though, and tends to present extremely noticeable uniformity issues (where part of the display looks very bright, and another very dim). Personally, I prefer it off. Despite this, the monitor’s HDR does have some use. While it’s nowhere near as good as leading OLED and mini-LED monitors, it can provide some indication how HDR content looks on other displays. It’s not ideal, but if you only occasionally work with HDR and you don’t need a perfect representation of what your content will look like on other displays, it’s passable. Asus ProArt PA32QCV motion performance The Asus ProArt PA32QCV is VESA MediaSync certified. MediaSync is a less well-known Adaptive Sync standard which is focused more on media playback than gaming. It only requires Adaptive Sync operation in the 60Hz to 48Hz range but set limits on things like frame-to-frame jitter when playing 24 FPS content on a 60Hz display. To be honest, I’m not sure how useful it is. I don’t often watch 24 FPS movies on a monitor, instead more typically playing games or watching YouTube, where content is usually at 30 FPS or perhaps 60 FPS. Still, MediaSync includes Adaptive Sync (albeit over a limited range), so it can help provide smooth motion in games. Motion clarity, though, isn’t great. The monitor claims a gray-to-gray pixel response time of 5 milliseconds, which isn’t awful, but certainly doesn’t stand out in 2025. IPS gaming monitors can hit 1 millisecond or, rarely, 0.5 milliseconds. OLED can provide response times as low as 0.03 milliseconds. Your perspective will come into play. Professionals who always stick to 60Hz displays, preferring extra features over enhanced motion clarity, won’t see anything amiss. But if you’ve tried a 240Hz OLED monitor, the PA32QVC’s reduced motion clarity will be apparent. Should you buy the Asus ProArt PA32QCV? The Asus ProArt PA32QCV does for 32-inch 6K monitors what the Asus ProArt PA27JCV did for 27-inch 5K monitors. It brings the resolution to a more affordable price point and does so without major problems or trade-offs that might make the PA32QCV unappealing. It does have downsides, like a low contrast ratio and modest motion clarity. But if you want a 32-inch 6K monitor mostly for the resolution (which, I suspect, many 6K shoppers do), the PA32QCV delivers that for hundreds—and in some cases, thousands—less than the alternatives. Read...

At a glanceExpert`s Rating Pros File, image, and system backup One-way sync and disaster recovery Doesn’t cost a dime Easy to learn and use Cons Purchase nag on exit Recovery disk creation may require a free third-party utility Our Verdict If you don’t mind an ad here and there, the startlingly capable standard version of Aomei Backupper will meet most users’ needs for zero coin. Can’t argue with that. But creating boot discs was problematic and required the Rufus utility. Price When Reviewed This value will show the geolocated pricing text for product undefined Best Pricing Today To keep essential data backed up, most users can easily get away with using Windows integrated File History, and/or Windows Backup (online accounts with OneDrive). However, Windows’ own disaster recovery options aren’t reliable. Hence, a freebie like Aomei Backupper Standard, that offers the reliable full system recovery that Windows lacks, is key when it comes to quickly getting back to where you left off if your computer suffers any kind of major mishap. Alas, Backupper Standard couldn’t do that without help. I had to employ the venerable third-party boot disk creation tool (Rufus 4.8) to create Backupper recovery media that would boot successfully on my test systems. Consider that worthy utility a necessary adjunct to Backupper Standard. Read on to learn more, then see our roundup of the best Windows backup software for comparison. What are Aomei Backupper Standard’s features? I did a comprehensive comparison of Backupper Standard and Backupper Professional to discern which features were and were not implemented in the former, and was surprised at how little was in absentia. All the basics from the pay version are there: file/folder backup, system/drive/partition imaging, one-way sync with the ability to schedule all of them. Incremental and differential backup are supported as is disaster recovery — though, as mentioned, I ran into a bit of an issue creating the recovery disks. Ultimate success was mine, but read the performance section carefully. Aomei Backupper Standard is shockingly full-featured for a freebie. Backupper Professional features that are missing are: mirroring, two-way, and real-time sync; culling of backups (removing old unneeded files to make room for more); system clone and partition functions; as well as advanced features like the recovery environment (a hidden partition on your main drive that you can boot from to restore), PXE boot (network boot), command line usage, etc. There’s also very affordable cloud storage with the pay version, but it can only be used for Backupper backups, not any other data. Those are all nice features for more advanced users, and if you like the sound of them, read our Aomei Backuppper Professional review. How much is Aomei Backupper Standard? The only cost associated with Backupper Standard is a small banner ad at the top of the main Window, and a nag to buy the Pro version when you exit the program. Really, that’s it. Below you can see the retail and discounted prices of the Pro version on the aforementioned nag and the rather humorous exit button text: “Give up the task.” Nicely, there’s a perpetual license available for Pro — something now absent from industry heavyweights Acronis True Image and Macrium Reflect. I’m not sure if this is Aomei being mirthful or just something lost in translation, but I got a chuckle out of the exit message on the nag dialog Put succinctly, the Professional version of Backupper adds some nice features, but they’re not necessarily ones that most users need. Or at least they’re ones you can live without. How does Aomei Backupper Standard perform? Generally speaking, Backupper Standard performed quite well. At least with basic tasks; however, there were a number of non-fatal issues. A minor issue that’s been with Aomei Backupper for a version or two is that, if you create a new folder while using the select-destination dialog, then immediately rename the new folder to something meaningful inside the dialog, Backupper doesn’t sense the change. Instead it tells you it can’t find “New folder.” Back out and start the find/define dialog again and it will then find it. The major issue, however, was creating boot disks that would actually boot — a must-have for disaster recovery. Backupper would create Linux and Windows PE ISO’s just fine, but the USB disk it created would not boot on my UEFI test bed. This is likely because they were formatted to MBR and not GPT, with no option for the latter. After numerous tries with various USB media, I gave up and used Rufus 4.8 to create a recovery disk from the ISO files that would boot. Even then, the Linux version wouldn’t boot. Stick with the Windows PE. Backupper Standard performed better than fine. Boot media for disaster recovery in a freebie? We love it. Once PE recovery media was successfully created, Backupper Standard performed better than fine. It’s not as fast as the Professional version, but it’s hardly slothful either. Most importantly, it finished all backup and restore tasks without error — including a full system restore. I will forgive just about anything if the all-important backup and restore operations work properly. Note that this same boot disk creation issue plagues the Professional version. Aomei really needs to revisit its recovery media tool. While Backupper Standard restored my system just fine, make sure you download Rufus and test the recovery media thoroughly before committing yourself to the program for disaster recovery. Also, I suggest you download Macrium Reflect 8 Free as a hedge. My only other nit, a minor one, is that if you want to select a network location, you must enter it manually by its root network address, e.g., 192.168.1.105. You don’t have to type in the entire path (e.g., 192.168.1.105\Public\Documents) as after you supply the user name and password, you can then browse the folders at that location using a standard expandable tree. Should you use Aomei Backupper Standard? Backupper Standard is surprisingly full-featured and offers the reliable (once you create the boot media) disaster recovery that Windows lacks. That it costs you nothing but some time clicking through a nag upon exit is a boon. Indeed, if EaseUS Todo backup weren’t available in an equally free version, Backupper Standard would be our top pick in free backup. Try both and if Aomei’s creation fits you better, download it, and of course Rufus. Read...

A competition dreamed up by high school students and a dedicated teacher has stopped as many as 10 million seeds of a toxic pest plant spreading into the Northland environment. Read...

It`s commonly assumed that Maori women don`t carve, but one group of wahine are creating an environment to support others who want to learn the craft. Read...

At a glanceExpert`s Rating Pros Respectable 1080p performance Excellent OLED display Fans aren’t very loud Not wildly heavy Cons Lenovo’s pricing is all over the place Short battery life Our Verdict The Lenovo Legion 5i 15IRX10 pairs an excellent display with solid internals for a great gaming experience. With a $1,199 price tag on a configuration close to our test unit, the value looks good. Just avoid Lenovo’s unnavigable first-party pricing. Price When Reviewed This value will show the geolocated pricing text for product undefined Best Pricing Today Best Prices Today: Lenovo Legion 5i Retailer Price $1,599.99 View Deal Price comparison from over 24,000 stores worldwide Product Price Price comparison from Backmarket Best Prices Today: Check today’s prices Lenovo has a new generation of gaming laptops out, and Legion 5i 15IRX10 sits at the affordable end of the stack without cutting down too much. It features powerful processor options and a few RTX 50-series GPUs to power your games. Though Lenovo makes finding a good value hard with a chaotic pricing system, this Walmart configuration comes closest to our test unit and pegs the system at a solid bargain of $1,199. At that price, things look real peachy for the potent Legion 5i 15IRX10. Lenovo Legion 5i: Specs and features Model number: 15IRX10 CPU: Intel Core i7-14700HX Memory: 32GB DDR5 Graphics/GPU: Nvidia RTX 5060 (40-watt TGP) Display: 15.1-inch 1600p OLED,165Hz, Dolby Vision, VESA Trueblack 600 Storage: 1TB PCIe Gen4 SSD Webcam: 5MP Connectivity: 1x USB-C 10Gbps with Power Delivery and DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB-C 10Gbps with DisplayPort 1.4, 3x USB-A 5Gbps, 1x RJ45, 1x HDMI 2.1, 1x 3.5mm combo audio Networking: WiFi 7, Bluetooth 5.4 Biometrics: Windows facial recognition Battery capacity: 80 watt-hours Dimensions: 13.58 x 10.05 x 0.85 inches Weight: 4.3 pounds MSRP: Approximately $1,199 as-tested ($1,299 base) Though our test unit has the above configuration, Lenovo does not appear to offer this exact setup to consumers. There is plenty of customization available though. The Legion 5i 15IRX10 can come with 13th or 14th Gen Intel Core processors in this configurator, or even bump up to 2nd Gen Intel Core Ultra processors in a separate configurator. At the low end, you can get an Intel Core i7-13650HX with 16GB of memory, 512GB of storage, and an RTX 5050 for an “Est Value” of $1,634 (but an actual price of $1,299 at the time of writing) using the custom configuration tool. Bumping up to a Core i7-14700HX or Core i9-14900HX is also possible, but entails a swap to the RTX 5070 as well. Arrow Lake configurations have the same memory and storage options, but they start out with an Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX and RTX 5060 for an “Est Value” of $1,704 and actual pricing at $1,309. This can be upgraded to an Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, which also comes with an RTX 5070 instead, and brings the price to $1,559 (though the “Est Value” shows as $1,954). One notable difference of the Core Ultra models is that they upgrade one of the USB-C ports to Thunderbolt 4.  Using Lenovo’s custom configurations, there’s not a huge delta between the Raptor Lake and Arrow Lake options, and the Core Ultra models are likely to have superior single-core performance and battery life. That said, the configurator tends to have significantly higher prices than pre-configured models and therefore doesn’t offer a great value.  For those seeking the best price, Walmart offers the closest configuration to what we’re testing here. It’s available for $1,199 at the time of writing, and includes all of the above specifications except only 16GB of memory. Thankfully, that DDR5 is user-upgradeable, so you can cheaply bump it up to this system’s 32GB if needed. The Lenovo Legion 5i has an excellent display for gaming and entertainment, a sturdy build, solid performance, and surprisingly quiet fans. Lenovo Legion 5i: Design and build quality IDG / Mark Knapp The Legion 5i 15IRX10 isn’t remarkable in its design, but it’s not disappointing either. The system is completely blacked out aside from its Legion logo power button, the white keyboard legend and their RGB lighting, and a little gray Lenovo branding on the rear thermal shelf. All that black looks fine briefly, but it starts to show finger oils quickly.  The looks are largely clean with rounded corners and chamfered edges around the base that may not be super ergonomic but are at least more comfortable than sharp 90-degree angles. The base is all plastic with a smooth polycarbonate upper and rougher ABS plastic bottom. The base is fairly sturdy, not exhibiting much flex. The display is surrounded by modest plastic bezels. The back of the display gets the one premium aspect: an aluminum lid with Lenovo’s Legion branding embossed with a smoky mirror finish. The construction is similar to many of Lenovo’s other Legion laptops. The top of the display has an extra-large section to both house the camera and provide a lip for opening the lid easily. The display attaches to the base with two hinges slightly shifted forward from the back edge of the laptop. This creates a little butt (thermal shelf) at the back with extra room for heat sinks. That back edge is largely occupied by exhaust vents. No exhaust goes out the sides.  Underneath, the Legion 5i 15IRX10 sits on three large rubber feet that hold it firmly in place and lift it up a good ways to provide airflow into the two bottom fans. There’s a large grille underneath, though only a small percentage of this is actually grille — mostly right under the fans. In this case, this at least allows sufficient air intake and doesn’t provide any extra opportunity for dust to get in.  All told, the Legion 5i 15IRX10 isn’t particularly inspired or exciting, but it feels decent and is a sturdily built laptop. The choice of a 15.1-inch display provides decent screen space while keeping the laptop small enough to fit into even some tight laptop sleeves. It’s not so heavy either at just 4.3 pounds. And thanks to the very thin display and modest base, the build isn’t very thick for a gaming laptop.  Lenovo Legion 5i: Keyboard, trackpad IDG / Mark Knapp My experience with the Legion 5i 15IRX10’s keyboard has been somewhat mixed. On one hand, the keys are surprisingly well stabilized, and they have a decent dish to help feel out the center and edges. But their travel is kind of rubbery, giving them a somewhat odd feel, like they also push my fingers back when resetting. With some adjustment, I could see this actually turning into a positive, as a quick-resetting key is ready to press that much sooner, but as it stands, it sort of throws my fingers into a funk. I was ultimately able to get up to a typing speed of 114 words-per-minute with a decent 97 percent accuracy, but this still isn’t quite exceptional.  I still love that Lenovo accommodates a full-size set of arrow keys on many of its gaming laptops. This makes navigation so much easier. There’s also a full number pad on the right side of the keyboard, though this has slim keys that end up feeling a little cramped.  Lenovo packed in 24 RGB lighting zones, which ultimately kind of feels like overkill for any system that’s not just going to buckle down and give you per-key lighting. The 24 zones do allow for a slightly smoother wave or lighting that responds to audio playing from the computer. But the zones are all vertical columns, not functionally useful zones. Customization options are rather limited. And the edges of zones blend together when displaying different colors, so you won’t get an impactful and precise customization no matter how you shake it. The keyboard will let you cycle through backlighting presets by pressing Fn+Space, but there’s no key for adjusting backlighting brightness. That must be done through Lenovo’s Legion Space software. On the bright side, the lighting effectively illuminates the key legends.  The trackpad is nothing special. It’s fairly small for a laptop this size, but still spacious enough for four-finger gestures and general navigation. It’s far over to the left side of the computer, though, which can make it awkward to use for right-handed users. It’s mylar surface is also not as smooth as it could be. Lenovo Legion 5i: Display, audio IDG / Mark Knapp The Legion 5i 15IRX10 offers an excellent display. Just about every aspect of it delivers quality, and that’s great to see from a gaming laptop that skews toward the budget side of things. The 2560×1600 panel is plenty sharp at the size. It has the perfect contrast of OLED, not to mention the ultra-fast pixel response times. And with a 165Hz refresh rate, you’ll get smooth visuals both in and out of games. OLEDs weren’t always very bright, but this panel happily hits 523 nits. And to top it off, the panel is accurate. I measured its color accuracy at an average dE1976 of 0.51 with a max dE1976 of just 1.33. If you’ve got to do serious color work or just want to see your games the way they’re meant to look, this screen is up to the task. The audio isn’t quite as impressive, but it’s not bad. The speakers rely on the Nahimic app to provide sufficient sound, and it thankfully helps deliver on that. Playing games and watching movies, it provides plenty of audio generally, though I did find some spoken videos surprisingly quiet while listening with the app set to its default Music mode. There’s not much stereo separation from the little bottom-firing speakers even though they sit at the outer edges of the laptop, so they don’t make for the most engrossing game audio.  Lenovo Legion 5i: Webcam, microphone, biometrics IDG / Mark Knapp You’ll get a decent camera from the Legion 5i 15IRX10. Even though it’s sharp, it will appear a bit soft in modestly lit spaces. Even with several lights on in my small office, footage appeared soft and grainy. That said, it managed a very natural exposure. Though the camera offers a high resolution, it doesn’t have the infrared tech to enable facial recognition. The laptop also lacks a fingerprint scanner, so you’re out of luck for biometrics. The mic array on the Legion 5i 15IRX10 fails to impress. In a busy environment, it struggles thoroughly to capture my voice clearly. It does successfully eliminate background noise to a degree, but fully at the expense of its ability to pick me up. As soon as I talk in that loud environment, the background noise merges with my voice and makes anything I say unintelligible. Even in a quiet environment, my voice sounds rather distant with some room echo noticeable.  Lenovo Legion 5i: Connectivity IDG / Mark Knapp There’s little to get excited about from the Legion 5i 15IRX10’s various connections. It’s not making the most of its size, offering just two USB-C ports on the left side along with a USB-A port and Ethernet. The right side includes two USB-A ports, a 3.5mm jack, and a camera kill switch. The laptop’s charging port is located on the rear along with an HDMI port. The ports on the sides are rather awkwardly spaced with gaps of varying sizes between them. For instance, the USB-A ports on the right have the entire height of the keyboard dividing them. None of the ports are terribly fast either, with the USB-A ports topping out at 5Gbps and the USB-C ports hitting just 10Gbps — no 20 or 40Gbps ports. At least the HDMI port is up to the 2.1 spec. Both USB-C ports can also handle video output with one offering DisplayPort 2.1 and the other DisplayPort 1.4. The wireless connections are managed by a MediaTek card that offers Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 5.4. It’s been fast and reliable in my testing, though as with many MediaTek cards I’ve used over the years, there is often a small delay when waking up the laptop from sleep before it will reconnect to known networks.  Lenovo Legion 5i: Performance The Legion 5i 15IRX10 is built with high-performance in mind, even if it isn’t aiming for the highest levels possible on modern hardware. This kind of horsepower generally makes everyday operation and even light creative workloads a breeze. We can see that quite clearly in PCMark 10, which measures holistic performance of the system. The Legion 5i 15IRX10 performs wonderfully. It’s not exceptional in this category, though. Most gaming laptops have plenty to offer in this area, and the Legion 5i 15IRX10 actually ends up looking less impressive next to even older machines. The Dell G15 and Gigabyte G6X both ran on a lower-tier CPU and a prior-gen RTX 4060 GPU, and yet they came out ahead in this test. The previous generation Lenovo Legion 5i also came out well ahead thanks in part to a more potent CPU and faster storage.   IDG / Mark Knapp On the bright side, the Legion 5i 15IRX10 lagging behind those systems in PCMark isn’t the biggest deal, since all of the systems are offering smooth and responsive operation. And when it comes to raw horsepower, the Legion 5i 15IRX10 claws back some ground. Its processor offered substantially higher performance in Cinebench’s multi-core testing, dramatically outstripping all but the earlier Legion 5i’s Core i9-14900HX. This also helps us see why Lenovo opted for an older CPU. The newer Intel Core 7 240H falls well shy of the Core i7-14700HX’s performance, even failing to match its single-core speeds. It means little that the Core 7 240H is newer, though, as it’s actually a Raptor Lake CPU in disguise and not one of the newer Lunar Lake or Arrow Lake architectures.  IDG / Mark Knapp The combination of a potent CPU and newer RTX 5060 GPU works in the Legion 5i 15IRX10’s favor when it comes to graphics performance. Where it had fallen behind the prior-gen Legion in some cases, it turned the tides back into its favor in 3DMark’s Port Royal test, where it pulled well ahead of the Legion 5i. It also demonstrates how a strong CPU can avoid bottlenecks by thoroughly outpacing the Alienware 16 Aurora despite this machine running the same GPU. IDG / Mark Knapp Its performance in synthetic benchmarks translated well to actual games, too. It churned out an average of 153 fps in Shadow of the Tomb Raider. Here again, it shows the difference a CPU can make, as the RTX 5060-powered Alienware fell behind all the RTX 4060-powered machines because its CPU was holding the GPU back. The Legion 5i 15IRX10 doesn’t have the same issue, and that lets its RTX 5060 show the generational uptick in performance it’s capable of.  IDG / Mark Knapp This performance checks out in Metro Exodus as well, where the Legion 5i 15IRX10 again leads the pack by a decent margin. The balance of a strong CPU and GPU help it stay ahead of these other systems, which appear largely held back by the limitations of the RTX 4060 (or Intel Core 7 240H in Alienware’s case). Of course, this does also highlight the limitations of the Legion 5i 15IRX10. In very demanding games, like Metro Exodus, it can struggle to meet the 60 fps threshold. That said, the system could hit an 82 fps average in Cyberpunk 2077 at 1080p Ultra.  IDG / Mark Knapp Performance is consistent, too. Running a string of Steel Nomad benchmarks, the Legion 5i 15IRX10 maintained nearly the same average framerate between runs. CPU and GPU temps also settled in and stopped increasing after just a couple minutes. The fans aren’t even terribly loud to manage the thermals.  Since the Legion 5i 15IRX10 has a 2560×1600 display, you might be tempted to play games at this resolution. In some lighter games, that will be readily doable. The Legion 5i 15IRX10 managed a 98 fps average in Shadow of the Tomb Raider at its native resolution. But in Cyberpunk 2077, it only hit 48 fps. For native resolution gaming, you’ll likely want to tap into DLSS and potentially frame generation technology.  Lenovo Legion 5i: Battery life As we see all too often, performance advantages tend to come at the peril of battery life. And sure enough, the Legion 5i 15IRX10 struggles to offer much longevity where runtime is concerned. In our local video playback test, it fell a little bit shy of four hours. That’s not only a bad result for a gaming PC, but it’s bad among this group, especially compared to the Alienware 16 Aurora’s surprisingly strong 10-hour runtime IDG / Mark Knapp In normal use, the battery life isn’t any better. I was able to stream a two-hour movie with the display at about 50 percent brightness and still have an hour of battery left. Web browsing, research, and writing consumed the battery at a similar rate, with it just scraping by at over three hours. Lenovo Legion 5i: Conclusion The Legion 5i 15IRX10 has plenty going for it as an affordable gaming laptop, assuming you steer clear of Lenovo’s inscrutable pricing and just go with the Walmart model closest to our test configuration. For $1,199, the Legion 5i 15IRX10 is offering a lot. It has an excellent display for gaming and entertainment, a sturdy build, solid performance, and surprisingly quiet fans. Though the design is decently portable, the battery doesn’t last long. So you’ll want to bring the charger if you plan to do much on the go. A lot of the value here hinges on the low price though. With upgraded internals, the price of different configurations can truly soar, and the quality of this laptop doesn’t quite feel like it stacks up against $2,000 systems. But as a low-cost option, it’s great. Read...

Although support for Windows 10 will not end in October 2025 after all, Microsoft’s additional grace period extends its life by only one year. This means that many users will soon not only have to say goodbye to their operating system, but also to their computer in the near future. Even if its components are powerful enough for Windows 11, it may become electronic waste: This is because Microsoft has strict requirements for the hardware on which the new operating system can run — especially when it comes to the processor. Most PCs and laptops that are more than eight years old are therefore excluded from the upgrade — even though they work without any problems under Windows 10 and would certainly do the same under Windows 11. However, you can make your computer officially fit for Windows 11 with small hardware upgrades: Whether this is worthwhile, whether it is even possible, and how much it costs depends on the specific PC or laptop. What your computer needs for Windows 11 The requirements that Microsoft places on a computer for Windows 11 look low at first glance: Processor with 64-bit support, two cores and a clock speed of 1GHz 4GB RAM 64GB storage for the installation Many old computers fulfill these requirements, which aren’t dissimilar from the requirements for graphics hardware with Direct X 12: Even PCs that are over 10 years old have suitable components. To make a PC with an Intel processor suitable for Windows 11, it is not enough to simply replace the processor. The new CPU also needs a new motherboard because it has a different socket format. IDG The same is true of Microsoft’s demand for a motherboard that has UEFI firmware with the Secure Boot function: This was already mandatory for computers with Windows 8, so complete systems should have been equipped with it since 2013. The requirement for TPM 2.0 is more problematic: Windows stores security keys in the Trusted Platform Module, which also monitors the PC boot process to ensure that no malware is active before Windows loads. TPM 2.0 was mandatory for complete systems with Windows 10, meaning that computers sold since the end of 2016 should be equipped accordingly. Prior to this, PCs and laptops were usually equipped with TPM 1.2 — which Microsoft believes makes them too insecure for Windows 11. However, most computers will fail to overcome one hurdle when switching to Windows 11: According to Microsoft, they absolutely need a processor that is on the official compatibility list, which is available for Intel, AMD, and Qualcomm models. This rules out all computers intended for private users that are equipped with an Intel processor before the 8th Core generation (“Coffee Lake,” “Kaby Lake R,” “Kaby Lake G,” “Amber Lake Y”) or an AMD CPU whose cores are not based at least on the Zen architecture. Complete systems with a supported CPU were available from spring 2018 — so if your computer is more than seven years old, Windows 11 cannot be installed without detours. Even with very old PCs, RAM, SSD, the processor clock rate or the number of cores are almost never the reason why Windows 11 cannot be installed. However, they lack security functions such as Secure Boot.WhyNotWin11 However, the Microsoft list is not consistent: Older processors such as the Intel Core i7-7820HQ from early 2017 or newer ones such as the AMD Athlon 3000G from the end of 2019, which is based on the Zen architecture, are also listed as suitable for Windows 11, although other processors with this architecture are excluded. Microsoft published new lists for the individual processor manufacturers for the Windows 24H2 update in February: They mainly contain more recent CPU models. However, some CPUs that were previously listed as supported have also been removed — including individual models from generations that are actually considered compatible with Windows 11. Whether this was accidental or intentional is unclear. These lists are actually aimed at PC manufacturers (OEMs), not private users. With older processors in particular, they do not give you any definitive certainty as to whether a particular CPU is supported by Windows 11 — and even if it is now, whether this will also apply to future updates of the operating system. How to check whether your PC is ready for Windows 11 If your computer is suitable for Windows 11 in its current configuration, you will be prompted at regular intervals to switch to the new system. Windows 10 also indicates this with a large window in the settings under “Windows Update”. Foundry If this is not the case for you, you can use tools to check how Windows 11-ready your PC is. Microsoft offers the PC Health Check for this purpose. Start the check by clicking the blue “Check now” button. If the computer fulfills the requirements for Windows 11, the overall result and the results for the individual components are highlighted in green. A yellow mark means that the tool could not perform the test for a specific requirement because the components or function was not recognized or has not yet been activated — for example, because Secure Boot is switched off. A cross in a red circle indicates that this component is preventing the upgrade to Windows 11 — in most cases the processor. Incidentally, you should not trust the age information displayed on the left-hand side of the tool’s start screen — it simply guesses based on certain system information, which has nothing to do with the actual age of the hardware or the Windows installation. The freeware WhyNotWin11 also checks the Windows 11 compatibility of the individual components and functions: Green means passed, red means failed. If the check tool reports that Secure Boot could not be detected, it may be because you have not activated this function. First start the Windows system information by running msinfo32 in the main window: “UEFI” must be in the “BIOS Mode” line. If “Off” is displayed for “Secure Boot State,” the UEFI supports Secure Boot, but it is not activated. To switch on Secure Boot, call up the UEFI settings: The most reliable way to do this is to click on “Restart now” in the Windows settings under “Update & Security > Recovery > Advanced Boot.” After a short time, the blue Windows pre-boot environment will appear: Select “Troubleshooting > Advanced options > UEFI firmware settings > Restart.” The computer now calls up the UEFI setup: Depending on the manufacturer, you will find the options for Secure Boot in the “Boot” or “Security” section. There, set Secure Boot to “Enabled,” “Switched on,” “UEFI,” or “Windows UEFI Mode.” After the restart, the “Secure boot state” in the system information should be set to “On.” If you open the TPM management under Windows with the command tpm.msc, the system will show you whether a corresponding security module is present and switched on. If Windows does not find a TPM in the system, you may first have to activate it in the UEFI setup settings.Foundry Proceed in a similar way to check for TPM: Enter tpm.msc in the Windows search window. If the information for a TPM and “Specification version 2.0” appear, everything is OK, version “1.2” is not sufficient for Windows 11 — you need a new processor here. If you see “No compatible TPM found,” the TPM may be compatible but not active. Now you need to call up the UEFI again and look for an option such as “Security Device,” “TPM State,” or, on a computer with an Intel CPU, “Intel PTT” or “Intel Platform Trust Technology.” The corresponding options for an AMD computer are called “AMD fTPM Switch” or “AMD PSP fTPM.” Set them to “On,” “Enabled,” or “Activated.” You need to replace this hardware for Windows 11 For an older PC, the route to Windows 11 usually involves changing the processor: Older CPUs also fulfill some of Microsoft’s requirements — they usually come with TPM 2.0 and their motherboard offers UEFI firmware with Secure Boot. However, the models on the compatibility list have additional functions that their predecessors do not have and that cannot be added later via an update: In most cases, these are security precautions against malware attacks on the operating system. The quickest and cheapest way to make an older PC fit for Windows 11 is to equip it with a processor that Microsoft allows. To do this, you must first clarify whether the CPU in your computer is soldered to the motherboard or sits in a socket — only then can it be replaced at all. Find out the model designation of the CPU — for example via the Windows Device Manager under “Processors,” in the Windows settings under “System > Info,” or with a hardware analysis tool such as HWinfo 64 or Speccy. Then research the technical data for this model on the processor manufacturer’s website — for example ark.intel.com. The hardware tools are also helpful — in HWinfo 64, look for “Main processor -> CPU platform.” If terms such as “Socket,” “PGA,” or “LGA” appear there, it is a socketed processor that can generally be expanded. If, on the other hand, you see the abbreviation “BGA,” also in the form “FC-BGA,” the processor is soldered onto the board — you cannot replace it. A complete PC with a desktop or tower housing usually has a socketed processor, whereas in many laptops the CPU is soldered. However, there are exceptions: All-in-one PCs or small mini PCs often use soldered laptop CPUs, while large laptops — for example, gaming and high-end laptops — often have a socketed processor. Intel: How to choose a suitable processor If the processor can be changed, the next step is to clarify whether a Windows 11-compatible model can be used instead. The new processor must fit into the existing slot on the motherboard installed in the PC. For older computers with Intel processors, your chances are slim: The socketed models from the CPU generations that are suitable for Windows 11 — from Coffee Lake onwards — use a different slot than their predecessors. This is also called LGA1151 — but version 1 differs from version 2 for Coffee Lake in terms of the electrical connections: You can therefore use a newer processor, but it will not work. When switching to Windows 11, you will therefore need a new processor and a new motherboard for the Intel platform. Only if the processor sits on the board in a socket can it be replaced with a new one. You can use check tools such as HWinfo64 to find out whether this is the case with your computer. IDG Depending on how powerful you want your computer to be after the upgrade, the upgrade will cost you between around $200 and $500. In addition, you can skip several CPU generations from Intel when buying a new processor and motherboard, as newer models are hardly more expensive than older ones: This not only makes the updated computer fit for Windows 11, but also gives it a generous increase in speed. If your old PC uses DDR4 RAM, you can even use the RAM on a board for the 14th core generation “Raptor Lake-R” from last year: A suitable motherboard such as the Asus Prime H610M costs around $100, and you can get a solid mid-range processor such as the Core i5-14400 as a boxed version with cooler for around $140. It will be significantly more expensive if you want to equip your old PC with the latest CPU generation Arrow Lake: Inexpensive processors such as a Core Ultra 5 225 cost around $250, with a suitable motherboard costing just over $100. You will also need DDR5 RAM, which is around $40 for 16GB capacity. If you only have a tight upgrade budget, you can opt for a board with an LGA1200 slot for an Intel PC: CPUs up to the 11th-generation Rocket Lake can be used there, such as a Core i5-11400F, which costs around $115 with a fan. In addition, an LGA1200 board such as the Gigabyte H510M v2 costs around $100. There are no costs for a new drive in any case: All boards for the upgrade options shown have M.2 and SATA connections so that you can continue to use an existing SSD — unless you need a flash memory with a larger capacity. The cheapest M.2 and SATA SSDs with 512GB are around $30 — an SSD with PCI Express 3.0 is sufficient for M.2 because the recommended boards do not support a higher PCIe version for the drive. In many cases, you can continue to use your existing power supply unit: Its connections should be suitable for the new board and the new components, unless you are using a powerful graphics card. However, it is generally advisable to replace the power supply unit on a computer that is six years old or older. Hardware upgrade for an AMD computer The upgrade path to Windows 11 is more favorable if you have a computer with an AMD processor: The manufacturer continued to use the AM4 socket for the older processors until 2022. This means, for example, that a Ryzen 7 1700 that does not work with Windows 11 can be replaced with a processor from the Ryzen 5000 series, such as the Ryzen 7 5700 or the Ryzen 7 5800XT. These models are still readily available and cost between $120 and around $180 with cooler. Many old PCs with AMD CPUs only need to be replaced to make them compatible with Windows 11. Check beforehand whether there is a UEFI Bios update for the installed board that supports the new processor.IDG Before you buy the new processor, check whether your existing motherboard supports it: The manufacturer must provide a suitable UEFI update, which can be found out on the support pages for the relevant board. You can continue to use the built-in RAM and an existing SSD. As with Intel, newer AMD processors support higher clock rates for DDR4: In everyday PC use, however, it is usually hardly noticeable that the existing DDR4 memory in the old computer runs a little slower. Read...

Jim O`Malley said he does not feel safe as the chair of the hearings committee as he felt targeted by the chief executive. Read...

The foreign secretary has written to the Environment Agency to tell them about the error, and has now bought a licence. Read...