At a glanceExpert`s Rating Pros Terrific performance Synapse utility app is fantastic Smartly designed, comfortable keyboard Thunderbolt 5 Light and quiet (for a gaming notebook, anyway) Cons Battery life is abysmal Windows doesn’t accommodate dual-mode screen well Boot sequence could be more responsive Ports could and should be labeled Our Verdict Razer’s Blade 18 outperforms basically everything else out there, with an exception or two. This relatively quiet gaming notebook does suffer from the short battery life of its rivals, and the default 4K screen is so good that the cool dual-resolution mode will probably go underused. Price When Reviewed This value will show the geolocated pricing text for product undefined Best Pricing Today Best Prices Today: Razer Blade 18 (2025) Retailer Price Razer $4599.99 View Deal Check Price comparison from over 24,000 stores worldwide Product Price Price comparison from Backmarket Best Prices Today: Check today’s prices Razer’s Blade 18 is the limo you take to the airport: probably way too much laptop for your daily needs, sure. But why not simply enjoy it? Someone who buys an 18-inch laptop simply wants the best and biggest laptop around, a desktop replacement capable of playing any game at maximum frame rates. That’s fine for most people. Smart buyers, however, will consider the Blade 18 since its aesthetics have a purpose. For 2025, the laptop brings several notable updates: Intel’s latest Arrow Lake architecture, Nvidia GeForce GPUs up to the RTX 5090, and a new dual-mode screen that combines a 4K creator-class display with a high-resolution esports monitor. Fantastic performance, smart design, even weight that won’t burn out your biceps. There’s very little I didn’t like about the Razer Blade 18. Overall, the Razer Blade 18 excels where performance matters most, combining thoughtful design and powerhouse hardware, though its battery life and minor quirks remind you this is a premium desktop replacement, not a portable workhorse. Razer Blade 18: Configuration options Razer’s 2025 update of the Razer Blade 18 steps up to Intel’s Arrow Lake Core Ultra 9 275HX, whose mobile performance impressed me. But there’s also Razer’s first use of the Nvidia GeForce RTX 5000 lineup, memory that jumps to 64GB, and up to 4 TB of storage. Razer has returned to using a dual-mode screen, first seen on the 2023 version of the Blade 16. That model offered a less robust version of what’s in the 2025 Blade 18. During the day, you can edit on its 4K, 240Hz display. By evening, switch to a 1080p, 480Hz mode for esports gaming. Razer’s RGB logo adorns the back of the Razer Blade 18.Mark Hachman / Foundry Razer used to sell its Blade laptops on Amazon as well as its own site. At the moment, however, most models have been pulled from Amazon. The only place to buy the Blade 18 appears to be Razer’s website. If the Blade 18 is simply too much, Razer also ships the Blade 16 and Blade 14, though the components step down a bit. A larger notebook allows for more cooling, which means more power can go through the CPU and GPU. Both the Blade 16 and Blade 18 offer an RTX 5090 option, but the Blade 18 supports 175W of GPU power versus 160W on the Blade 16. That usually translates to higher performance. At Razer, your choices are limited: every version ships with an Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX. Otherwise, you can downgrade the GPU from an Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 with 24GB of VRAM to an RTX 5080 (16GB VRAM) or to a 5070 Ti option. The way Razer phrases it seems like simply dropping down to an RTX 5080 will save you $1,100, period. But Razer ties your GPU selection to other RAM and storage options, so that there are essentially four versions of the Blade 18 to choose from: Razer Blade 18 with RTX 5090, 4 TB (2TB + 2TB) SSD, 64GB RAM: $4,599.99 (as tested) Razer Blade 18 with RTX 5090, 2TB SSD, and 32GB RAM: $4,199.99 Razer Blade 18 with RTX 5080, 1TB SSD, 32GB RAM: $3,499.99 Razer Blade 18 with RTX 5070 TI, 1 TB SSD, 32GB RAM: $2,999.99 Razer also tosses in some “gifts” — at press time, Borderlands 4, Battlefield 6, and a month’s worth of Game Pass Ultimate PC — with the purchase of the Blade 18, as well. Mark Hachman / Foundry Razer Blade 18: Specifications Display: 18-Inch dual-mode IPS display: 3840×2400, 240Hz; 1920×1200, 440Hz (non-touch) Processor: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (5.4GHz turbo, 24 cores/24 threads) Graphics: Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, 12GB GDDR7 VRAM/RTX 5080, 16GB GDDR7 VRAM/RTX 5090 (150W + 25W dynamic boost), 24GB GDDR7 VRAM (5090 as tested) NPU: No Memory: 32GB-64GB DDR5-5600 (64GB as tested) Storage: 1TB-2TB M.2. NVMe PCI 4.0; 4TB (both M.2. slots filled) (4TB as tested) Ports: Thunderbolt 5 (DP 2.1, 100W charging), Thunderbolt 4 (DP 2.1, 100W charging), HDMI 2.1, RJ45 (2.5Gbps Ethernet), UHS-II SD, 3.5mm headphone jack Security: Windows Hello (camera) Camera: 1440p, 30 Hz (user facing) Battery: 99Wh Wireless: Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.4 Operating system: Windows 11 Home 24H2 Dimensions: 15.74 x 10.84 x 0.86-1.1in. Weight: 7.06 pounds Color: Anodized black Price: $$2,999.99 – $4,599.99 ($4,599.99 as tested) Razer Blade 18: Out of the box Most ultra-premium gaming laptops that I’ve seen tend to prioritize the internal components over the external chassis: throw in a bit of RGB bling and spend the rest of your engineering talent worrying about keeping the components cool. Take the rival Maingear Ultima 18: it’s just a big black slab. Stick it on its end, and you can imagine a tribe of apes worshiping it while “Also sprach Zarathustra” plays. Razer’s Blade 18 is different. Instead of extending the laptop’s underside the length of the laptop, there’s a “bump” that protrudes from the underside, housing the cooling module. A small cutout “exposes” some of the components behind a clear Mylar plastic window, lit by user-adjustable RGB lighting. Mark Hachman / Foundry Add to that the existing RGB-lit Razer logo that’s already mounted on the top/rear of the laptop itself, and that’s a healthy dose of RGB right there. Fortunately, it’s out of sight, and at least the vapor chamber lighting can be disabled, if necessary. All this isn’t totally unique; the Alienware 16 Area 51 includes a similar cooling bump and light-up logo. But it’s still an interesting twist that attracts the eye. (Note to Razer: if you’re going to leave the logo lighting on at all times, an Ambilight mode might be a neat addition.) Unlike other gaming laptops I’ve tried, the Blade 18 doesn’t feel ungainly. At 7.06 pounds, it’s surprisingly manageable. The chassis is made from CNC-milled aluminum and features a fingerprint-resistant coating. (That’s technically true. Fingerprints might not stick, but the chassis will pick up oil and dust, and I had to spend a few minutes polishing the chassis for photos.) You’ll find a couple of fun quirks right off the bat: the first is the dual-mode display, which we’ll talk about in a bit. The second is the keyboard, which not only offers a number of adjustable RGB lighting effects, but also assigns two RGB LEDs to selected keys. Put another way, when you hit the SHIFT key, the RGB lighting will illuminate only the “%,” “^,” and “&” keys, not the numbers themselves. Notice how when the SHIFT button is depressed, only the punctuation lights up, not the numbers. And yes, the chassis attracts fingerprints.Mark Hachman / Foundry One of the few things I didn’t like about this laptop is that the relatively uninspired boot sequence. Hit the power button, and the Blade just sits there — or seems to. While there’s a small green light on the front of the keyboard tray that lights green during the boot sequence, the rest of the laptop seemingly doesn’t respond. Only after the Windows boot sequence appears on the screen does the laptop respond with a “ripple” of RGB lighting across the keyboard, a visual signal that you’re ready to go. The power cord might be a bit polarizing, too. I’ve used Maingear laptops and bemoaned the jiggly, rear-mounted power cord. Razer uses a side-mounted power cord (connected to a 400W charger) and it’s quite stiff to work it in and out of the charging port. Some of you might like that (how often do you remove a gaming laptop’s power cord, anyway?) but I found it slightly annoying. Note that while this laptop does include a Thunderbolt 5 port, that port doesn’t support the full 240W charging spec — just 100W instead. Of course, even TB5 couldn’t supply the nearly 400W that the Blade 18 demands under full load. The fan noise on the Razer Blade 18 certainly does get loud under load, as expected from a gaming notebook. It’s not overwhelming, just a bit unpleasant. There’s minimal coil whine, but it’s there. Razer says that it’s expanded the vapor chamber to its largest ever, combining triple fan blades and 0.075mm exhaust fins to generate 280W across the package. Our thermal tests (more in the performance section, below) detected no thermal throttling under prolonged CPU and GPU testing. That’s the result Razer was designing for. I like to put my laptops on my desk’s keyboard drawer, and the Blade 18 is a bit too big for that. You’ll need a flat desk, or risk the laptop supporting itself on its cooling bump. That’s probably fine, but still. (I did all my testing on a flat surface.) One note on the ports, which are listed above: this is the first laptop I’ve seen with both a Thunderbolt 5 and a Thunderbolt 4 port on it, neither of which are labeled. The TB5 port is on the right, and the TB4 port is on the left. The left side of the Razer Blade 18 includes a Thunderbolt 5 port, which is unlabeled, as well as the HDMI and USB port.Mark Hachman / Foundry I found myself repeatedly returning to the hyper-detailed Razer Synapse application, which contains controls for adjusting the lighting, laptop performance, and display. Razer includes several performance profiles, (Balanced, Silent, Performance, and Turbo), which I bounced in and out of depending on the application. Unfortunately, the “Silent” mode wasn’t entirely silent, even when simply writing this review, and I would have liked it to shut down the fan entirely. Synapse also failed to launch the “Razer” module for adjusting the performance when I rebooted the laptop without an internet connection. Turning on the Wi-Fi reinstated the module and the performance settings, which were still there after turning off the Wi-Fi. I don’t know if it was a glitch or not, but I wasn’t impressed. That’s one of the few things I didn’t like about Synapse, which is about as well-thought-out as utility software goes these days. I’m a little surprised that Razer shipped the laptop with Windows 11 Home, not Pro, but PCWorld’s software store features some killer Windows 11 Pro deals — at press time, a Windows 11 Pro license is just $13. On this side, there’s a Thunderbolt 4 port as well as Ethernet, more USB-A, and the power port and 3.5mm jack.Mark Hachman / Foundry Razer Blade 18: Display A major change for the 2025 Blade 18 is the display. Previous models offered either a QHD+ mini LED panel (2560×1600) at 300Hz or a 4K screen at 300Hz, both stretched to 18 inches diagonally. That’s the traditional way of buying a laptop; you choose one or the other. With the 2025 version of the Razer Blade 18, you get a dual-mode display — both for the price of one, basically. The price, if there is one, is that there’s no touchscreen. You can use the incredibly handy Razer Synapse application to switch between display modes.Mark Hachman / Foundry Specifically, the Blade 18 offers a 3840×2400 240Hz display, switchable to a 1920×1200, 440Hz option after rebooting the laptop. The idea is that creators will spend all day designing using the 4K option, then swap to the super-high-refresh-rate option for after-hours fun. In reality, I actually never wanted to switch to the 1200p mode, since playing games at 4K+ resolutions at 240Hz is pretty damn cool all by itself. Since the Consumer Electronics Association considers 4K to be 3840×2160, you’re getting a bit better than a 4K screen just to begin with. Ditto for the 1080p-ish 1200p mode, too. The drawback is that both share the same IPS panel, which some might consider a downgrade compared to the miniLED panel of yesteryear. The Razer Blade 18 (2024)’s miniLED panel boasted 2,000 “dimming zones” that can be turned off and on to approximate the elite contrast of an OLED panel. IPS doesn’t really offer the same visual contrast. Another issue is that Windows didn’t automatically adjust the scaling when switching from 4K to 1200p resolution. The scaling became enormous, and in some applications, I couldn’t access menu items at the bottom of the window without connecting to an external display. Windows, unfortunately, thought that the new resolution was a minimum, so that the only adjustment to be made would be to make the text and windows even larger. The Razer Blade 18 color gamut, as measured under the 4K (left) and 1080p) settings (right). That only seemed to happen with the laptop display, however, under Windows. The games I tried adjusted for the new settings. And when connected to an external display the text on that display rendered normally. Still, if you’re going to buy a laptop with a premium display, it should work correctly. Otherwise, the color gamut on the Blade 18’s display wasn’t quite as good as a creator-class notebook, but it put out a hefty 532 nits of luminance whether it was in the 4K or 1080p mode. That’s enough for working outside, though the abysmal battery life of this laptop will mean that you won’t be working long before you hunt down a power outlet. Razer Blade 18: Keyboard and trackpad Razer’s purchasing department obviously bought the Blade 18’s trackpad at the warehouse store, with an enormous touchpad that’s nearly 6-inches wide and 3.75-inches long, reaching nearly from the edge of the keyboard tray to the spacebar. Unfortunately, only about half was easily clickable, with an additional quarter or so clickable after applying substantial pressure. That gives the trackpad a bit of a vestigial feel. After all, Razer would be happy to sell you one of its branded mice. Mark Hachman / Foundry The keyboard, however, is far better. The Blade 18’s keys depress with 1.5mm of key travel, which is about where I like it. Keep in mind that I typically use a business keyboard, where 1.25mm of key travel is common — I welcomed the additional travel distance. If you’re looking for a truly mechanical keyboard with far more key travel, however, something like the Alienware X16 R2 might be more your style. Each key is configurable via the Synapse key to configure it for a keypress, macro, mouse movement, or more, and there are even four dedicated “memory keys” to store specific configurations. Using the Synapse application, you can adjust each key’s function in eight different ways! As mentioned above, many of the keys have dual RGB LEDs inside them, all configurable from the Synapse application. Depress the SHIFT key, and specific keys light up; that goes for the function (FN) keys as well as the NUMLOCK keys. That’s hella cool, and I was unreasonably happy that Razer included that function. The Razer Blade 18 in a darkened room.Mark Hachman / Foundry When playing a game, the WASD (and R and C) keys light up by default (or at least by a setting that I didn’t recall tweaking). Given that I’m a left-handed gamer and use the keypad instead, that’s actually a little insulting. However, there’s a full 10-digit number pad to the right, an important concession to lefty gamers who use that instead of WASD keys. Razer Blade 18: Webcam, microphone speakers The Razer Blade 18’s webcam is passable. Supposedly it allows for 1440p video captures at 30 Hz, but I suspect that it’s using some of that additional resolution to crop in and “zoom” in on your face using Windows Studio Effects. In any event, the image is somewhat soft, and my face looked a bit too ruddy under artificial light and too washed out under natural lighting. This isn’t necessarily a plug for PCWorld’s recommendations of the best webcams, though if you can afford a $4,000 gaming laptop, what’s an additional $50 or so? What Razer is primarily concerned with, however, is the laptop speakers, especially when playing back movies and playing games. Razer’s speakers are passable, and a bit bass-heavy; that’s not surprising for a laptop with four woofers and a pair of tweeters, all enhanced via THX. Nothing stood out in my mind as something I’d prefer listening to, and that was while the laptop’s fans were set to “Silent.” Mark Hachman / Foundry Typically, gameplay on a gaming laptop is accompanied by roaring fans. While Razer’s Blade 18 doesn’t overwhelm you with noise, the fans are loud enough to drown out the small nuances. A game like Expedition 33, for example, demands headphones to ensure you hear the full range of the score. Put another way, the typical Blade 18 customer will be using headphones anyway. The noise filtering on the two dual- array microphones, though, is nearly perfection — some of the best I’ve (not) heard, ever. I usually hold up my phone and move it behind my head and off to the side, playing back rock music and then some white noise at a loud volume. The Razer Blade 18 filtered it all out — every bit — perfectly. I couldn’t really find any built-in controls for this, so it must have done it by default. Just be sure and adjust the Windows settings for the mic (System > Sound > Properties > Test mode for microphone audio processing) to the Communications drop-down setting, or else your voice will sound somewhat hollow. Razer Blade 18: Is it a Copilot+ PC? No. As we segue into our performance testing, it’s worth pointing out that most of the Intel Core Ultra Series 2 processor family does include an NPU with the requisite 40 TOPS requirement to earn the Copilot+ designation. The Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX does not. But the 275HX does include an NPU with 36 total TOPS. And Nvidia’s 5090 GPU — basically the most powerful mobile GPU on the planet at the moment — will absolutely chew through AI tasks while just falling short of earning Microsoft’s AI badge of honor. Crazy! Razer Blade 18: Performance Spend $4,500 on an 18-inch notebook, and you probably have one requirement: that it play any game you’d like, at full resolution. We can’t say this with certainty, but the Blade 18 will certainly get you almost all of the way there. Note: in the performance tests below, frame generation and upscaling are off. Some gamers call these “fake frames.” The results here are “farm-to-table” frames, rendered directly by the notebook itself. You can turn on these upscaling features for additional performance, though some people notice a small drop in visual quality as a result. In almost all cases, the laptop is good enough to deliver more than playable framerates without any AI enhancements. In the high-end “Turbo” mode, the Blade 18 pulls close to its rated 400W at full load.Mark Hachman / Foundry For a laptop like this, you want to take the best gaming laptops out there, lock them in a room, and don’t let them out until one survives. The only fair thing to do is to put the $4,599 Razer Blade 18 up against other industry heavyweights. We chose the $3,599 Maingear Ultima 18, the $5,099 MSI Raider A18 HX A9W, the $4,199 MSI Stealth 18AI Studio A1V, the $3,700 Gigabyte Aorus 17X, and the $3,349 Alienware 16 Area-51 AW30. All of these except for the last two include 18-inch displays, which gives the chassis more than enough room for sizeable cooling options. We plugged in last year’s $3,549.99 Alienware m18 R2 with a Core i9 14900HX and an RTX 4090; how does that compare with 2025’s newest CPU and GPU? We also added Razer’s own 16-inch, which offers a different CPU but a similar RTX 5090 GPU (at 175W) and at a very comparable $4,499 price. I tested the Razer Blade 18 in both of its “4K” and “1080p” configurations, because I wasn’t sure if the performance would differ. As it turned out, they do not. But it’s a question I didn’t know the answer to with certainty, so it was worth investigating. Likewise, I tested the Razer Blade 18 in both its default “Performance” configuration as well as the top-end “Turbo” mode. Turbo kicks the power consumption up a notch, from a peak of 380W to 392W — close to the rated 400W charger limit. In some cases, performance increases. I tested using this setting as well, and the “Turbo” results are designated using the black outline around the red bar indicating the Razer Blade 18’s score. We can generate a general level of CPU performance using the Cinebench benchmark, which pushes all of the laptop’s CPU threads to their utmost to render a scene. Mark Hachman / Foundry On the desktop, AMD’s Ryzen AI processors have bested Intel’s Arrow Lake architecture. In mobile, it’s much closer, and the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D squeaks by a tiny margin, even above the “Turbo” setting. We’ve used older Cinebench benchmarks in the past; the R2024 test takes longer and works the system harder. In general, however, all of these 18-inch (and even one 16-inch) notebooks are very close where synthetic CPU performance is concerned. Handbrake takes this approach and extends it. This is an open-source conversion tool, originally designed to allow you to shrink down movies to store on a tablet for use on a long airplane flight. It asks the CPU to run at its fastest speeds for a long duration — this test could take over an hour to run on a Celeron a decade ago, but this now requires just minutes to complete (6.78 minutes, for the Razer Blade 18) to convert an entire 90-ish minute movie. We measure the time in seconds it takes Handbrake to complete the job. Mark Hachman / Foundry The one test we were not able to run was UL’s PCMark 10, which according to UL’s support staff has a known issue with Nvidia’s latest GPU driver and the RTX 5090. That’s disappointing, as PCMark still uses a representative swathe of applications, from web browsing to video chats to light gaming and CAD work, and generates a score. While I’d like to include these numbers to provide a complete picture, I think I can safely say that the Razer Blade 18 will handle all of your office tasks with ease. We can move on, then, to the GPU performance. We’ve used the UL 3DMark test to evaluate synthetic 3D performance, specifically the Time Spy test for compatibility’s sake. You’d expect the RTX 5090 inside the Razer Blade 18 to perform well, and it does. Mark Hachman / Foundry Gaming, of course, is a big reason why you’re buying this laptop. We use a representative series of three games as a benchmark across generations of laptops and desktops. Shadow of the Tomb Raider, published by Square Enix, doesn’t feel especially old, yet it was released in 2018. We push the graphics quality to its highest setting and turn off frame-generation, ray tracing, and various effects. You can see the massive generational jump from gaming notebooks that use CPUs and GPUs just a generation old and what the latest laptops like the Razer Blade 18 can achieve. For reference, most gamers may tolerate 30 frames per second in some games, but 60 fps is usually considered the minimum, with 90 fps preferred. All of our gaming benchmarks are expressed in frames per second (fps), and you’ll have no issue here. Remember, this laptop has a dual-mode screen. But while I ran these benchmarks on the 4K as well as the 1080p, high-refresh-rate settings, I saw no difference. Mark Hachman / Foundry Here we see that, well, there are games and settings that will push the Blade 18 to its limits. Deep Silver’s 2019 game, Metro: Exodus, certainly does. Here, we use the game’s “Extreme” settings, which does leave ray tracing off, but turns on other effects to give the game a more dynamic look. While all of our test laptops can play this game, there’s a definite spread between the most powerful devices on the top of this chart, and those below. Mark Hachman / Foundry It’s hard to believe that Cyberpunk: 2077 is almost five years old, too. This game has been a phenomenal benchmark, with a wide variety of available settings. This is a game which would like you to turn on ray tracing. For this test, I do — both the 1080p Ultra settings are tested, as well as the “Ray Tracing Overdrive” setting which really asks everything of the laptop. Remember, we turn off upscaling and frame generation to help generate consistent scores. But after turning on frame generation and upscaling, Cyberpunk delivered 130 fps (minimum 118 fps) on the Ray Tracing Overdrive setting at the native settings of the panel, 3840×2400. In other words, you can push Cyberpunk, at maximum settings, to deliver playable frame rates at the native panel resolution. (At 1080p, the result was 269 fps.) All of this subsample of tests dialed up the laptop to its maximum Turbo settings. Mark Hachman / Foundry Although Razer doesn’t market its Blade 18 as an AI workstation, the fact that it includes an RTX 5090 GPU with a hefty 24GB of VRAM automatically qualifies it for AI use. I recently reviewed the Framework Desktop, which includes AMD’s “Strix Halo” Ryzen AI Max chip, with gobs of memory. That allows it to load large AI LLM and image models, which gives it a leg up in terms of AI capabilities. It’s also much quieter. But the fact remains that most AI apps take full and best advantage of a GPU. These are test workloads, so the models used by UL’s Procyon test are going to be smaller and more outdated than the state of the art. But they’re also standardized. In this context, there’s simply no content between an “AI workstation” and the gobs of GPU compute power than an RTX 5090 can generate: four times the Framework Desktop. The same holds for AI chatbots or LLM text generation, too. Here, I’m much more sympathetic toward AMD’s processors. One of the measures of LLM performance is simply how quickly the response can be generated, in both the time to the first token (or word) and how quickly the entire answer is generated. In my book, speed matters a bit less if you can’t read as quickly as the AI generates its response. The Framework Desktop can allocate up to 96GB of VRAM for AI in our review unit. By comparison, the 5090 GPU in the Blade 18 allows only 24GB. This means the Blade 18 is much faster at calculating AI responses, though you might prefer the quality of results it produces. So there’s a subjective as well as an objective angle to this particular test. The weak spot? Battery life, naturally. For whatever reason, gaming laptops simply don’t last longer than a few hours in terms of battery life unless they’re tweaked. And this is just video playback. Just become accustomed to bringing your charger in case you want to game on the road. And remember, the Thunderbolt port doesn’t supply enough juice to keep the Blade 18 running for long. Mark Hachman / Foundry The chart above ranges from awful to rather good, actually. You might not be impressed with how the Razer Blade 16 performs on all of the gaming benchmarks, but it won’t conk out as quickly as the Razer Blade 18 will, that’s for sure. All told, the Razer Blade 18 delivers 4.9 hours of battery life while playing back video. But it’s a gaming laptop, right? So how long does it last while gaming? On battery, looping the Time Spy gaming benchmark, the laptop’s uptime was just one hour, six minutes. That is really bad. Synapse does come with numerous adjustments and configurations that can be made while on battery, but you’re still trying to draw blood from a stone. Razer Blade 18: Conclusion Of all the gaming laptops we’ve tested, I think that the $3,349 Alienware 16 Area-51 AW30 offers the most bang for your buck, though it’s a smaller 16-inch machine. But aside from the truly abysmal battery life — which, to be fair, is typical of most gaming laptops anyway — the Razer Blade 18 shines. I wondered whether Razer’s goal of a thin, “light” gaming laptop would fall short. A typical 18-inch gaming laptop weighs about eight pounds, while the Blade 18 comes in just above seven pounds. As our performance tests indicate, it certainly doesn’t fall short. My main gripe is that Windows doesn’t smoothly handle shifting between the two screen modes, which means near-constant UI adjustments. The stiff charger and quirky boot sequence add minor annoyances, though Synapse remains an exceptionally well-thought-out piece of software. Overall, the Razer Blade 18 excels where performance is concerned, which certainly is the key metric. But it’s also clear how much thought and care went into the design, and that won me over early on. In all, the Blade 18 easily earns PCWorld’s Editor’s Choice award. Read...

The Governor-General`s term is being extended, because her original end date may clash with next year`s election. Read...

The move is to avoid a clash with the 2026 General Election. Read...

School zones, the commute to work and general vibe of the area - what you should know and how to suss it out. Read...

As early as 2024, scientists from the US and China discovered that the Earth’s core had slowed down and even stopped moving in relation to the Earth’s crust. But until now, the general public—that’s people like you and me—has barely noticed this remarkable change. The Earth’s core is comprised of metals and, as the name suggests, makes up the interior of the Earth. It consists of a liquid outer core (made of iron and nickel and other elements, which play a role in the Earth’s magnetic field) and a solid inner core (also made of iron and nickel, at a temperature up to 5,700 degrees Celsius). The Earth’s outer core begins around 1,800 miles below the Earth’s surface and the inner core begins around 3,200 miles below. Rotation changes in the Earth’s core For a long time, scientists assumed that the Earth’s inner core had a stable, even, and constant rotation below the Earth’s crust. However, with the help of seismic analyses (i.e., studies of earthquakes), researchers have discovered that this rotation is by no means constant but fluctuates. These fluctuations can be so massive that the Earth’s core can move as fast as the Earth’s crust and then appear to stand still. However, this doesn’t mean that the Earth’s core rotates in the opposite direction. Instead, it only appears that way because it rotates more slowly in relation to the Earth’s crust—sometimes even significantly more slowly. Nor does the Earth’s core ever remain stationary, but simply stops changing in relation to the Earth’s crust. This current slowdown in the rotation of the Earth’s core began as early as 2009. At that time, the Earth’s core and crust moved more or less in unison, but since then, the movement of the Earth’s core has become even slower. It seems that the Earth’s core changes its rotational direction relative to the Earth’s crust every 35 years. Therefore, the fluctuations that comprise an entire cycle last 70 years. What effects does this have on Earth? Technically, days can become longer or shorter due to the changes in rotational speed of the Earth’s core. However, the changes are tiny—in the range of milliseconds. We humans might not notice this, but it can have an effect on astronomical measurements and satellites. Changes to the Earth’s magnetic field and the climate are also possible. Read...

Social media has recently been lit up with claims that a recent Windows update is killing SSDs. According to Microsoft, Windows isn’t at fault. In fact, recent reports show that this problem only occurs on drives with pre-release firmware updates from storage manufacturer Phison. (Pre-release firmware updates are internal builds that never should’ve seen the light of day in actual consumer hardware.) The good news is, the latest Windows update won’t kill your SSD. Even if you’re affected, you can restore your drive with a firmware update. The bad news is, your SSD can still fail for a number of other reasons. Putting Windows Update aside, let’s talk about some of the other real threats to your SSD and what you can do to protect it. Check for SSD firmware updates SSD manufacturers provide utilities that check for firmware updates and monitor your drive’s health. They’re worth installing—and it’s especially true since this recent issue is related to pre-release firmware updates. It’s a good idea to check if your drive has the latest stable firmware installed. Firmware updates may fix bugs and prevent other problems with your SSD. Avoid any beta firmware update files you may see for download on your SSD manufacturer’s website. First, you’ll need to figure out what SSD you have in your PC. One easy way to check is to open File Explorer, right-click your “C:” drive, click “Properties,” and then look under the “Hardware” tab. Or you could just download and launch CrystalDiskInfo. (It’s one of our favorite Windows apps for checking the health of your PC.) Pick the right utility based on your SSD manufacturer: Samsung Magician, SanDisk Dashboard, and Crucial Storage Executive are some big ones. (Despite the name, SanDisk’s utility also handles firmware updates for Western Digital drives.) Perform a web search for the name of your laptop manufacturer and “SSD utility” to find the right utility app. If you have a laptop, your laptop manufacturer’s software may handle firmware updates for the built-in drive, too. This isn’t guaranteed, though. You may need to run a utility created by the company that manufactured the laptop’s built-in SSD instead. Chris Hoffman / Foundry Since I have a Samsung SSD in my desktop PC, I downloaded Samsung Magician. Look for an “Update” option in the app and check if there are any available firmware updates for your drive. If so, make sure you get them installed sooner than later. Ensure your SSD is properly cooled SSDs can generate a lot of heat—especially PCIe 4.0 SSDs and PCIe 5.0 SSDs! Some SSDs come with heatsinks and some don’t, and you can also install an aftermarket heatsink on a standard M.2 SSD. But whether you need a cooler for your SSD really depends on the particular drive you have and the general thermal profile of your case. CrystalDiskInfo is a great way to check your SSD’s temperature, health, and other statistics. If you’re curious about how well it’s cooling, you might also want to run a benchmark using CrystalDiskMark (a synthetic benchmark we use to test SSDs here at PCWorld), which can stress test your drive and monitor it during real-world operations like file transfers. But make sure you check its temperature while writing a lot of data to the drive, not just while reading data from it. Chris Hoffman / Foundry As a rule of thumb, it’s best to keep your SSD below 70 degrees Celsius. If you see the SSD getting hotter than that, that’s a sign it may be throttling itself and not performing at max potential in an effort to stay cool. The exact temperature you need to watch out for depends on your drive—look up its specs in the manual to find its rated operating temperatures. If it’s too hot, look into improving the airflow in your PC’s case and/or installing a heatsink on your SSD. Don’t completely fill the drive Solid-state drives wear down faster when they’re near maximum capacity. That means if your SSD has been at 95% capacity for a long time without much breathing space, it has likely worn down more than necessary. This is less of an issue these days thanks to overprovisioning—many SSDs have a good chunk of “extra” storage—but it’s still a good idea to keep a decent amount of free space on your SSD. Nor Gal / Shutterstock.com For utmost longevity, you should aim to keep your SSD below 80% capacity whenever you can. One added bonus here is that SSD write operations are also faster when the drive is less full, so keeping a lot of free space can help boost your drive’s overall performance. Don’t cheap out on your SSD Not all SSDs are made equal. They differ in capacities and write speeds, and some SSDs are rated for more intensive write cycles, which means some drives wear out faster than others. For consumer-grade SSDs, the biggest difference is TLC (Triple-Level Cell) vs. QLC (Quad-Level Cell) flash memory. Drives with TLC storage have a higher TBW (terabytes written) rating, meaning they can perform more writes before the flash memory cells wear out. The trade-off is that QLC drives tend to be cheaper, for obvious reasons. Mark Hachman / IDG A QLC drive is fine for light PC use, but a TLC drive will hold up better if you’re doing a lot of writing to the drive. For example, a 1TB QLC drive may have a 220 TBW rating while a 1TB TLC drive might have a 600 TBW rating. The exact numbers will depend on the individual drives. If you’re a high-demand PC user—whether you’re downloading huge PC games, editing big media files, or performing any other kind of work that involves regularly writing a lot of data to the drive—you’ll get more mileage out of a TLC drive. The next time you buy a drive, check out our recommendations for the best SSDs for all budgets. Just in case: Back up your files Everything breaks eventually. While a modern SSD doesn’t have the fragile moving parts that made traditional mechanical hard drives vulnerable to failure, it can still break down. You may turn on your PC one day only to find your SSD has failed due to a hardware problem or electrical issue, even if its firmware is problem-free. Aiseesoft The only way to truly protect your data is to maintain backups. Back up locally, back up to the cloud, or both. But whatever you do, make regular backups so you aren’t caught off guard when your SSD fails. One final ‘smart’ warning Windows Update isn’t the main threat to your SSD. Firmware bugs, excessive heat, and write-related wear and tear are all problems you can avoid. Electrical issues and hardware failures are also possibilities. Keep on top of those and your SSD should last a while. Note that some SSDs show a “health status” via something called a SMART early warning system, and you can view this using tools like your SSD manufacturer’s utility app or CrystalDiskInfo. But SMART isn’t foolproof. There’s no guarantee you’ll get an early warning when your SSD is on the brink of failure. An SSD could be showing “in good health” and still end up bricked and unbootable the next day. Here’s the takeaway: a software bug probably won’t take out your SSD, and most SSD risks are things you can see coming and adequately protect yourself against. Ensure you’re using current stable firmware, keeping your drive cool, not filling it to the brim with data, and regularly backing up your files just in case. If you do all that, there’s a good chance your SSD will outlast most of your PC’s other components. Subscribe to Chris Hoffman’s newsletter, The Windows Readme, for more real-world PC advice from a real human. Read...

We always knew that consumers preferred Windows PCs over Macs, but the numbers now back it up. HP topped Apple as the most preferred PC maker in the 2025 iteration of the American Customer Satisfaction Survey — though general consumer satisfaction with PCs fell slightly compared with 2024 sentiments. Big names, like Microsoft, suffered in the eyes of their consumer critics. Customers polled by the survey, however, said that the overall design of computers has improved, and that they marked that aspect as the best of the computing experience. The worst? The agony of calling and then navigating through a call center to receive customer support. ACSI, which runs the study, said that it sent out thousands of email surveys to random customers, and the 16,205 completed surveys it received were used as the foundation for its 2025 report. Customers were asked about their experiences with the largest customers as well as an “all other” category. The ACSI received customer inputs on expectations, quality perceptions, and perceptions of value and used them as inputs to generate a score. The biggest slips in perceived quality were Apple, Microsoft, and Acer, all of which lost three points in the ACSI rankings. Last year, Apple topped the charts with a score of 85. Yet its score of 82 placed Apple second; Dell’s ACSI score also decreased by a point compared to 2024. However, ACSI assigned Dell a score of 83, making it the most popular computer company for 2025. ACSI Household Appliance and Electronics Study 2025 / American Customer Satisfaction Index LLC. The ACSI also included tablets in this category, and added Amazon to its list of manufacturers. Tablet satisfaction scores plunged, from 81 in 2024 to 77 in 2025. In general, computer satisfaction declined across every PC maker save Dell, which saw an increase in the satisfaction score from 2024’s 80 score to its 2025 score of 82. ACSI measured several aspects of the computing experience — design, availability of software, ease of operation, graphics and sound quality, and more — and generally found that customers ranked them essentially the same as in 2024. Customers expressed the least satisfaction with a computer’s ability to prevent crashing, the general state of “features” like the OS or preloaded software, and call-center satisfaction. (They apparently hadn’t moved past our first review of Windows 11.) ACSI Household Appliance and Electronics Study 2025 / American Customer Satisfaction Index LLC. “The service experience may be a factor in the deviating levels of satisfaction between desktops and tablets,” the ACSI found. “Manufacturers continue to expand their repair networks to connect users with convenient outlets for service, but high repair costs and inconsistent parts availability continue to hinder the service experience for some.” Interestingly, customers ranked the desktop experience higher than that using a laptop, though aspects like “website satisfaction” should have been mostly thee same for both. ACSI Household Appliance and Electronics Study 2025 / American Customer Satisfaction Index LLC. Still, the category with the most need for improvement isn’t PCs, but tablets. Amazon clearly has its work cut out for it. Read...

Local Democracy Reporting asked the council’s general ward candidates if they support the current Long-Term Plan direction to build a new facility on the site. Read...

The island`s electoral office is waiting for the Writ of Election from King Tupou VI, which is expected to be received on Thursday. Read...

Jim Johnson has been named head of Intel’s Client Computing Group, headlining a list of changes Intel made Monday to its leadership team. As part of the moves, Intel announced the departure of Michelle Johnston Holthaus, the former co-chief executive and head of Intel Products. Johnson had served as the interim head of Intel’s CCG as Holthaus took on senior roles. Now, his official title will be senior vice president and general manager, responsible for the PC and edge ecosystems, Intel said. Johnson has worked at Intel for 40 years, including in the Technology and Manufacturing Group and the Networking and Communications Group. Intel also has named a new head of its Data Center Group: Kevork Kechichian who joins as executive vice president and general manager of the Data Center Group (DCG). Kechichian formerly was the executive vice president of engineering at Arm. Intel also said that Naga Chandrasekaran, executive vice president and chief technology and operations officer of Intel Foundry, will expand his role to include Foundry Services. The promotions and new hires come at the tail end of management shakeups dating back to last year, when Intel chief executive Pat Gelsinger was forced out of his role as chief executive and replaced with Lip-Bu Tan, a prominent leader in the EDA industry. After Gelsinger left, Michelle Johnston Holthaus and chief financial officer David Zinsner were named co-CEOs. Former Intel exec Michelle Johnston Holthaus.Mark Hachman / IDG After Tan joined, Holthaus — formerly the executive vice president and general manager of Intel CCG — was then asked to lead Intel’s products team, which also included the Client Computing Group. Holthaus served more than 30 years at Intel, and will remain a strategic adviser to the company over the coming months, Intel said. Johnson will oversee the fall launch of Panther Lake, the company’s next CPU architecture, as well as the Intel 18A manufacturing process that will form its foundation. Tan, meanwhile, is looking for customers for both Intel’s 18A and the subsquent 14A manufacturing process, which may decide whether Intel remains in silicon manufacturing or not. Read...