
Search results for 'International' - Page: 6
| RadioNZ - 22 Apr (RadioNZ) Tourist hotspots are seeing a rise in hotel room rates with international visitor numbers back to 86 percent of pre-Covid levels. Read...Newslink ©2025 to RadioNZ |  |
|  | | NZ Herald - 22 Apr (NZ Herald) Portia Woodman-Wickliffe is eyeing up a third Rugby World Cup later this year. Read...Newslink ©2025 to NZ Herald |  |
|  | | Stuff.co.nz - 21 Apr (Stuff.co.nz) American styles carry international influence, but nearly all of the clothing sold domestically is made elsewhere. Read...Newslink ©2025 to Stuff.co.nz |  |
|  | | Stuff.co.nz - 21 Apr (Stuff.co.nz) The batting great speaks out about his “disappointing“ treatment at the hands of New Zealand Cricket. Read...Newslink ©2025 to Stuff.co.nz |  |
|  | | Stuff.co.nz - 21 Apr (Stuff.co.nz) “What I did during this pageant, wasn`t just for myself. It was for everybody back at home,“ says Tia Craig Walters. Read...Newslink ©2025 to Stuff.co.nz |  |
|  | | Sydney Morning Herald - 20 Apr (Sydney Morning Herald)They fled the Taliban four years ago. But with support from Australian cricket powerbrokers, it looks like Afghanistan’s women’s cricketers will get to play as a team in international competitions. Read...Newslink ©2025 to Sydney Morning Herald |  |
|  | | BBCWorld - 20 Apr (BBCWorld)Former Croatia international Nikola Pokrivac dies in a car accident in his native country aged 39. Read...Newslink ©2025 to BBCWorld |  |
|  | | BBCWorld - 19 Apr (BBCWorld)Mondelez International, which owns the brand, says it took the `difficult decision` to axe the 360g bar. Read...Newslink ©2025 to BBCWorld |  |
|  | | PC World - 19 Apr (PC World)Gosh, it’s getting hard to figure out the real price of stuff. And I’m not even talking about the madness surrounding tariffs, taxes, and international trade wars — I mean that companies will just straight-up lie about their real prices to make “discounts” look good. That’s what HP did, allegedly, and it’s paying a cool $4 million to affected customers.
That’s the end of a class-action lawsuit that started over four years ago, when two American plaintiffs complained that HP displayed “strike-through prices” on its store that weren’t actually real, thus inflating the discount that it looked like they were receiving. According to the report on Ars Technica, the plaintiffs allege that HP lied about how much quantity was available, in the familiar “only one left at this price” sense.
I say allegedly, because this is a civil suit, not a criminal case of false advertising, and HP has admitted no wrongdoing or liability as a condition of the settlement. It’s basically a $4 million “leave me alone” check. Though the plaintiffs did accuse HP of violating the US FTC’s deceptive pricing laws, it doesn’t appear that any actual law enforcement is involved. And it’s not as if these practices are isolated. The “FOMO” and time pressure sales tactic is omnipresent online, new variations of sales techniques that I remember from the infomercial days and before.
One personal bugbear of mine is a little company called Lenovo, the largest seller of laptops on the planet by volume. Whenever it announces a new ThinkPad model I truly, genuinely don’t know how much it costs, despite covering its products for over a decade. This is because the “manufacturer’s suggested retail price” often has zero relationship to the price that actually appears on Lenovo’s own shop and third-party sellers. It’s madenning. That’s why you should look very closely at any deal that claims a Lenovo laptop is $1000+ off.
But back to HP. You’re eligible to join the class-action settlement if you bought a laptop, desktop, mouse or keyboard from HP’s US online store, and it was marked as “on sale” for more than 75 percent of the time between June 5th, 2021 and October 28th, 2024. Products include generic HP, Envy, Spectre, Pavilion, AllinOne, Chromebook, Chromebase, Slim, Victus, and Omen lines, with very specific product numbers. You can get $10-100 back if your purchase qualifies.
For reference, HP posted 56.3 billion dollars in revenue in 2024. Read...Newslink ©2025 to PC World |  |
|  | | PC World - 18 Apr (PC World)It’s been a few years since USB-C first hit the scene. And while we still love how reversible it is and how powerful it’s become, we’re also more aware of the potential pitfalls around this high-powered cable.
There have been plenty of stories of poor-quality cables frying components, shorting chargers, or even catching fire, so we’ve gone to great lengths to test many options, including some of the best USB-C cables you can get and some of the most hazardous to avoid.
Here are some key gotchas you need to be aware of before buying a USB-C cable these days. Learn how to spot the bad ones and what you can do to end up with one that’s fast, durable, and priced well.
Further reading: Laptop makers, I’m begging you for this one simple feature
Don’t buy from no-name brands
This tip is true for most electronics, but it’s especially important for USB-C cables. You might think a USB-C cable is just a bit of wiring in a sheath, but actually there are several safety features — at least, there should be — that ensure safe power delivery.
Of course, just because safety regulations exists doesn’t mean that all manufacturers follow them, especially manufacturers who don’t have a reputation to uphold. That tends to be the case for manufacturers on the other side of the world who sell to the international market through sites like Temu, AliExpress, and Amazon.
Although sticking to recognizable brands isn’t an entirely foolproof method of securing a high-quality USB-C cable, it does eliminate a lot of the risk as far as safety transgressions are concerned. There’s also more likelihood of recompense if something does go wrong.
USB-C cable brands we recommend include:
Anker
Apple
Belkin
Cable Matters
Dockcase
JSAUX
Microsoft
SooPii
Ugreen
Avoid USB-C-to-USB-A cables
Gordon Mah Ung / IDG
If transfer speed is important to you and if your devices and chargers support it, always prefer to use a USB-C-to-USB-C cable rather than a USB-C-to-USB-A cable or converting it from one to the other with an adapter.
USB-A is limited in data transfer speed to 10Gbps and limited in charging speed to just 15W. Although there are some USB-C-to-USB-A cables that claim to handle up to 100W, these are typically based on proprietary charging technologies and only reach those rates when paired with appropriately compatible devices and chargers.
In comparison, modern USB-C-to-USB-C cables can handle up to 40Gbps of data transfer and up to 240W for fast charging. (That said, 100W and less is still the most common.) You don’t need to buy a cable with the highest specifications, but higher-spec cables are usually higher quality, and that can help ensure that you’re getting a good USB-C cable.
So unless you’re powering legacy devices that only support USB-A, you’re better off moving to end-to-end USB-C for both data transfers and charging if performance is a priority.
Buy Thunderbolt or USB4 if you can
Mark Hachman / Foundry
Thunderbolt (3, 4, or 5) and USB4 cables offer the highest charging and data transfer speeds possible for USB-C as of this writing. But most people don’t exactly need those tip-top specs, right?
Even so, there’s another good reason to buy one of these cable types: they must adhere to stricter specifications to earn their Thunderbolt or USB4 labels, especially Thunderbolt.
A USB-C 3.2 cable isn’t just slower and less capable than a USB4 cable, it’s actually built to a weaker standard and probably isn’t as high-quality. Thunderbolt 3, 4, and the newest Thunderbolt 5 standard have far higher minimum requirements and taller ceilings on potential quality.
All of this means that you’re way less likely to purchase a dangerous or underperforming USB-C cable if you stick to Thunderbolt or USB4. Just make sure you get whatever’s supported by your devices. (I mean, if none of your devices support Thunderbolt 4, you might as well save a bit of cash and opt for Thunderbolt 3 instead.)
Check the cable’s weight
Marcus Urbenz / Unsplash
Weighing cables before you buy them might seem like some old-timey superstition, but it’s as legitimate as anything else on this list.
Higher-quality USB-C cables are built with a thicker wire gauge, and that thicker copper wiring delivers a cleaner signal. Although some of a thicker cable’s heft and weight comes from its sheath, some of it comes from the wire itself — and more of that means a better cable.
We have the receipts to back this up, too. We previously tested whether all USB-C cables are the same and compared a $9 USB-C cable to a $19 alternative. Both measured six feet in length, but the cheaper one was much thinner and lighter. (The $9 one weighed 38 grams while the $19 one weighed 86 grams. A significant difference.)
Now, I know it’s not always easy or possible to weigh a cable before you buy it on the internet, but you can usually find weight in the cable’s technical specs. A little variation is okay, but if one cable is substantially lighter than others, consider axing it as a potential buy.
Avoid third-party magnetic adapters
Michael Crider / IDG
You may have seen magnetic tip adapters that attach a USB-C cable and turns one end into a magnetic quick release, much like what we saw in Apple’s defunct MagSafe cables. But you should steer clear of these because they pose a significant risk of hardware damage.
Many third-party magnetic USB-C cable adapters don’t offer protection against environmental damage to exposed pins. Others aren’t protected against debris shorting out the pins. There’s even the possibility of electrical arc damage when unplugging the connector.
That last point is particularly dangerous, and it happens because the USB-C standard was designed with the idea that a USB-C cable would be plugged into a USB-C port, providing ample time to cut power when the cable is removed. However, magnetic connections are much faster to detach, so there’s a chance that power delivery is still going on even after detaching, leading to electrical arcs and potential damage.
Stop using old USB-C cables
James Barber / Foundry
After all this advice, you might be thinking that it’s not worth the trouble and you might as well just use whatever old USB-C cables are lying around your home.
But be wary of doing that! USB-C standards have continued to improve dramatically over the years, and many of those older USB-C cables from years ago weren’t just slow — they were dangerous.
We performed an extensive test on older USB-C cables and found that most actually had the potential to provide too much power, which can damage ports and even fry devices. Do you really want to risk shorting your expensive laptop because you didn’t want to toss that old USB-C cable that’s been sitting in your drawer?
Spending a few bucks on a new USB-C cable can protect you from all sorts of headaches and make life more convenient with faster data transfer and charging speeds.
Further reading: The best USB-C cables worth buying Read...Newslink ©2025 to PC World |  |
|  |  |
|
 |
 | Top Stories |

RUGBY
Scottie Scheffler is the hottest of favourites to win a third golf major, after taking a three-shot lead at the 54-hole mark of the PGA Championship More...
|

BUSINESS
Urgent care is getting a 164 million dollar boost in this year's budget More...
|

|

 | Today's News |

 | News Search |
|
 |