News | Top Stories
6 Nov 2024 0:43
NZCity News
NZCity CalculatorReturn to NZCity

  • Start Page
  • Personalise
  • News
  • Sport
  • Weather
  • Shopping
  • Jobs
  • Horoscopes
  • Lotto Results
  • Photo Gallery
  • Site Gallery
  • TVNow
  • Dating
  • SearchNZ
  • NZSearch
  • Crime.co.nz
  • RugbyLeague
  • Make Home
  • About NZCity
  • Contact NZCity
  • Your Privacy
  • Advertising
  • Login
  • Join for Free

  •   Home > News > Politics

    A devastating hurricane doesn’t dramatically change how people vote – but in a close election, it can matter

    Natural disasters create practical challenges for voters and election administrators. But in some cases, voters can also pin the blame on the government, or judge a candidate by the federal response.

    15 October 2024

    North Carolina and Florida are changing administrative rules and, in some cases, issuing emergency funding that is intended to make it easier for people in areas damaged by Hurricanes Helene and Milton to vote.

    The recovery in both states is expected to extend far beyond the November 2024 election period. The majority of the people in the affected communities in North Carolina and Florida voted for Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump in 2020, making some election analysts wonder if some Trump supporters will be able to cast their ballots.

    Amy Lieberman, a politics and society editor at The Conversation U.S., spoke with Boris Heersink, a scholar of voters’ behavior after a natural disaster, to better understand if and how the recent hurricanes could shift the results of the 2024 presidential election.

    How can hurricanes create complications ahead of an election?

    A massive hurricane disrupts people’s lives in many important ways, including affecting people’s personal safety and where they can live. Ahead of an election, there are a lot of practical limitations about how an election can be executed – like if a person can still receive mail-in ballots at home or elsewhere, or if it is possible to still vote in person at their polling location if that building was destroyed or damaged.

    Another issue is whether people who have just lived through a natural disaster and will likely be dealing with the aftermath for weeks to come are focused on politics right now. Some might sit out the election because they simply have more important things to worry about.

    Beyond practical concerns, how else can a natural disaster influence an election?

    The other side of the equation, which is what political scientists like myself are mostly focusing on, is whether people take the fact that a natural disaster happened into consideration when they vote.

    Two scholars, Christopher Achen and Larry Bartels, have argued that sometimes voters are not great at figuring out how to incorporate bad things that happened to them into a voting position. In some cases, it is entirely fair to hold an elected official responsible for bad outcomes that affect people’s lives. But at other moments, bad things can happen to us without that being the fault of an incumbent president or governor. And voters should ideally be able to balance out these different types of bad things - those it is fair to punish elected officials for, and those for which it isn’t fair to hold them responsible.

    After all, a devastating hurricane is terrible, but it is not Kamala Harris’ fault that it happened. But Achen and Bartels argue that voters frequently still punish elected officials for random bad events like this.

    Their most famous example is the consequences of a series of shark attacks off the New Jersey coast in the summer of 1916. As a result of those attacks, the New Jersey tourism industry saw a major decline. While these findings are still being debated, Achen and Bartels argue that Jersey shore voters subsequently voted against Woodrow Wilson in the 1916 presidential election at a higher rate than they would have had the shark attacks not happened. They argue that voters did this even though Wilson had no involvement in the shark attacks.

    Five women stand in line and look at each other, as they stand in front of a table that has boxes on it and under it.
    Kamala Harris visits a Hurricane Helene donation drop-off site for emergency supplies in Charlotte, N.C., on Oct. 5, 2024. Mario Tama/Getty Images

    How else do voters consider bad events when they vote?

    Scholars like John Gasper and Andrew Reeves argue that voters mostly care whether elected officials respond appropriately to a disaster. So, if the president does a good job reacting, voters do not actually punish them at all in the next election. However, voters can punish elected officials if they feel like the response is not correct.

    The fact that Hurricane Katrina hit Louisiana in 2005 was not the fault of then-President George W. Bush. But the perceived slowness of the government response is something a voter could have held him responsible for.

    How do voters’ political affiliations affect where and how they lay the blame?

    Colleagues and I have shown that how people interpret the combination of a disaster and the government response is likely colored by their own partisanship.

    We looked at both the effects of Superstorm Sandy on the 2012 presidential election and natural disasters’ impact on elections more broadly from 1972 through 2004. One core finding is that when presidents reject state officials’ disaster declaration requests, they lose votes in affected counties – but only if those counties were already more supportive of the opposite party.

    If there is a strong positive government response, the incumbent president or their party can actually gain votes or lose voters affected by a disaster. So, Republicans affected by the hurricanes could become more inclined to vote against Harris if they feel like they are not getting the help they need. But it could also help Harris if affected Democrats feel like they are getting enough aid.

    The major takeaway is that if the government responds really effectively to a natural disaster or other emergency, there is not a huge electoral penalty – and there could even be a small reward.

    That is not irrelevant in a close election. If Republicans in affected areas in North Carolina feel the government response has been poor and it inspires them to turn out in higher numbers to punish Harris, that could matter. But if they feel like the response has been adequate, research suggests either no real effect on their support for Harris – or possibly even an increase in Harris voters.

    A man with a blue suit and red hat faces a man and a women wearing red and they stand in front of a partially destroyed red brick building with rubble on the ground.
    Donald Trump speaks with owners of a furniture store that was damaged during Hurricane Helene on Sept. 30, 2024, in Valdosta, Ga. Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images

    How much influence can a politician have on people assessing a government response?

    Scholars mostly assume that people affected can tell whether the government response was good or not. Trump and other Republicans are falsely saying that the response is slow and falsely claiming that Federal Emergency Management Agency money is being spent on immigrants who are not living in the country legally. There does not appear to be a slow government response to the hurricane in North Carolina, and there’s no evidence the response is insufficient in Florida, either.

    So, the question now is whether voters affected by these hurricanes will respond based on their actual lived experiences, or how they are told they are living their experience.

    The Conversation

    Boris Heersink receives funding from the Russell Sage Foundation.



    © 2024 TheConversation, NZCity


     Other Politics News
     05 Nov: The Green Party is urgently calling on Prime Minister Christopher Luxon to abandon the Treaty Principles Bill following reports it will be introduced on Thursday
     05 Nov: The US presidential election turnout could be affected by a 3,000km band of rainy and stormy weather
     05 Nov: New Zealand is still feeling the after-effects of high inflation
     05 Nov: The Associate Health Minister says her spat with health officials is an irrelevant distraction
     05 Nov: Concerns from Labour, for Christchurch homeowners affected by a new Government rule change
     04 Nov: High expectations for a lawyer's tactics - defending Brian and Hannah Tamaki
     04 Nov: Undoing the ‘deep state’ means Trump would undo over a century of progress in building a federal government for the people and not just for rich white men
     Top Stories

    RUGBY RUGBY
    Prince William meets young environmentalists and plays rugby on first day in South Africa More...


    BUSINESS BUSINESS
    New Zealand is still feeling the after-effects of high inflation More...



     Today's News

    Environment:
    Two marine marker flares caused a an explosives alert in Auckland's Murray's Bay this evening 21:57

    Entertainment:
    Jeff Bridges tries to instil "joy" on his film and TV sets 21:39

    Politics:
    The Green Party is urgently calling on Prime Minister Christopher Luxon to abandon the Treaty Principles Bill following reports it will be introduced on Thursday 21:17

    Entertainment:
    Bill Nighy "stole the complete works of Shakespeare" to prepare for his drama school audition 21:09

    Politics:
    The US presidential election turnout could be affected by a 3,000km band of rainy and stormy weather 21:07

    Entertainment:
    There is no "bad blood" between Zoë Kravitz and Channing Tatum following their sudden split 20:39

    Entertainment:
    Matthew Lillard worries he will never win an Oscar if he competes on 'Dancing with the Stars' 20:09

    International:
    When do polls close and when will we know the result of the US election? Here's how to follow along in Australia 19:57

    Entertainment:
    Willie Nelson isn't worried about dying 19:39

    Entertainment:
    Cynthia Erivo accepts that she is an "oddball" 19:09


     News Search






    Power Search


    © 2024 New Zealand City Ltd